It isn't just that attorney.
There are more .... like I said before, there are well known facts amongst the certified court interpreters about specific county courts in my State.
I do not want to name specific names, so please bear with me on that one.
Would you believe that an attorney got away with charging 300% more than they normally charge because (and this was specified in the decree) "the majority of the participants were deaf" ?
The Judge allowed it. Later, in a verbal online altercation I had with this attorney, he admitted to charging more because of interpreter fees as well as the "complicated nature of having to deal with the deaf".
He admittedly charged an excess of 300% more for the use of an auxiliary aid. That is like charging a person in a wheelchair to use a ramp.
