Isis

a l i v e said:
That's what leading me to think why should we kill them. Why not let them do it themselves? That way we can focus on issues here.
Click to expand...

Makes sense in the beginning, doesn't it? But we meddled in their business. The problem is obvious, if we allow them to establish a state, they will host terrorist training activity to start something horrific in the non-muslim world.
 
SCBassist said:
Makes sense in the beginning, doesn't it? But we meddled in their business. The problem is obvious, if we allow them to establish a state, they will host terrorist training activity to start something horrific in the non-muslim world.
Click to expand...

That is why we meddled in the first place, to prevent that from happening. But, we have a very vain President that likes to think by withdrawing all US troops in an area where we were trying to curb these barbaric killers enthusiasm, that he was ending a needless war and would be championed as such.

The problem is, that when he armed the Syrian Rebels fighting Assad, he gave ISIS those weapons. I can only assume they staged the chemical attack on innocent civilians so sugar daddy 'Bama would give them even more weapons. Now, Obama is having to negotiate with Assad to use Syrian airspace to take out these rebels he initially wanted Congress to support.

Since the American people told him "No" to Syria, ISIS, not receiving their weapons, decided to invade Iraq and get their weapons from the Iraqi Forces that had absolutely no back up or support from the US since ol sugar daddy pulled all the troops out. So, they were able to secure US weapons from the Iraqi forces that fled.

It appears that all of Obama's Ivy League books smarts have failed the country when the "real world" came knocking on the door.
 
Hopefully Obama will learn that we need to go in and kill everyone of them before it's too late. These people are worse than the Nazi's were in WWII, anyone who doesn't follow them or has different beliefs are killed, end of story. Bill Clinton didn't learn or couldn't comprehend how dangerous Al Queda was and let them get stronger and stronger until 9/11 happened. He should of sent in soldiers after the World Trade Center was bombed in 1992, to search out and kill Al Queda, and he basically did nothing, each time they attacked and each time he had a weak response and the best he could muster was 17 cruise missiles into Afghanistan after they tried to blow up the US Cole, and all Al Qaeda did was grow stronger. ISIS is worse than Al Qaeda ever was and need to be taken out in it's entirety.
 
a l i v e said:
An atomic bomb destroys these poor innocent children. Something to consider, no?
Click to expand...

those kids aint innocent.... look it up ( and Ive posted vids of what they do as well in other threads here)facts.
 
a l i v e said:
An atomic bomb destroys these poor innocent children. Something to consider, no?
Click to expand...

A Davy Crockett Missile was specifically designed to take out enemy convoys. It is a tiny fraction of the type of atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki (and hey, nukes actually were very effective at stopping Japanese aggression btw).

yes, we have far more superior weapons now that do not use nuclear fission. We are using them daily. ISIS isn't waning ... they are martyring their fallen.

Irradiate the soil where they stand. Microwave them. Give them no quarter, and nowhere to run.
 
an idiot knew this would all kick off years ago so after ruining their country Iraq Now we do owe it to them to help...Bush and Blair done for war crimes be a start....The IS, well America got death penalty use it don't bang them up in Cuba this time
 
caz12 said:
an idiot knew this would all kick off years ago so after ruining their country Iraq Now we do owe it to them to help...Bush and Blair done for war crimes be a start....The IS, well America got death penalty use it don't bang them up in Cuba this time
Click to expand...

Wow! This comment ranks right up there with your other comment about shotguns. You know .... The kind of shotguns that hold more than two shells, because you know they exist because you saw them. Isn't that special .... well bless your heart.

This is all obviously Bush's fault .... Why, just the other day he was over there beheading children with a hatchet he got off his horse ranch. It's true!!
 
Nuclear weapons would be overkill against ISIS terrorists. Too much risk of the effects drifting into friendly territory.
 
Reba said:
Nuclear weapons would be overkill against ISIS terrorists. Too much risk of the effects drifting into friendly territory.
Click to expand...

No, just level the mountains so they have no where to hide anymore... also make them glow in the dark so we don't have to waste money on night vision....lol
 
Bomb them.

I don't want sharia law here in US. Unfortunately, sharia law is already set in a few US cities.
 
Steinhauer said:
Wow! This comment ranks right up there with your other comment about shotguns. You know .... The kind of shotguns that hold more than two shells, because you know they exist because you saw them. Isn't that special .... well bless your heart.

This is all obviously Bush's fault .... Why, just the other day he was over there beheading children with a hatchet he got off his horse ranch. It's true!!
Click to expand...

you lost me...Bush and Blair take share of the problems....all the people who died ,do you think their families are asking why...
I am hypocrite I don't deny,i very anti death penalty and 'A'bombing but as a hypocrite I turn my head not look if America did it
 
I don't think I passed comment on guns,American laws to have them but apolgy if did
 
Back
Top