And your point is? People learn to read and write in many ways. More often, a whole langauge approach is more effective than a phonetic approach. And there are those with ASL as L1 langauge that have the highest English literacy skills across the board as applied to a subset in population....those would be deaf of deaf. Reason? Strong L1 langauge that can be applied to learning the L2 langauge (English) in its written (visual) form.
And, an error made when relying on phonics is still an error made from relying on phonics, and illustrates one of the pitfalls of the method.
But we digress....we are off topic, as this has absolutely nothing to do with the OP, but has simply been led into yet another discussion of CS.
