ummmmm...... u will need to talk to the landlord or manger of apt to see what is their policy about pets ... since i have allot of experience with apt pets since they require one or two pets per apt .... otherwise u would lose apartment along with bad credit history for place to live in.... U need to think twice before allow it if that person doesn't like that idea then tell that person to find somewhere else to live ... also, u probaly aware of that pretty nation wide round town or city have pet policy ban ... up here in Denver they have breed list ban which they are work on it since they said that pitbull is top pority to be ban ...
here is the informations as example :
http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_2840230,00.html
City snarls over state's command on dog-breed bans
By Tillie Fong, Rocky Mountain News
April 27, 2004
The Denver City Council on Monday unanimously approved a resolution that authorizes the city attorney to sue the state or take other legal action to protect the city's pit-bull ban.
"Make no bones about it," said Councilman Charlie Brown.
"By enacting (House Bill) 1279, our legislature is acting like a master, and we, Denver, the mutt.
"We're not going to roll over and play dead."
The resolution was introduced in reaction to HB 1279 becoming law last week.
The law allows dog-bite victims to file civil lawsuits to recover damages, even if it is the animal's first offense.
What drew the City Council's ire was a provision in the bill that bars cities from outlawing certain breeds of dogs.
That part of the new law meant, theoretically, that Denver's pit-bull ban, in effect since 1989, would no longer be valid.
After Gov. Bill Owens signed the legislation, Buddy, a bull terrier, and Nala, a pit bull, were released to their owners from the Denver Municipal Animal Shelter.
Nancy Severson, Denver's manager of environmental health, also issued a statement that same day that the city won't be picking up, impounding or killing any dogs based on their pit-bull breed.
The next day, the City Council held an emergency meeting to decide what to do.
That's when the resolution that was approved Monday night was drafted.Council members see the state legislature's action as usurping the home-rule authority of Denver to make its own laws.
"There is no such thing as a state dogcatcher, only a city dogcatcher," Brown said.
He said the Denver Municipal Animal Shelter spends $2.3 million a year and employs 44 people, but it is Denver residents who pay for the service, not the state.
"If we want to modify the ordinance, we can," Brown said.
"In the meantime, it's our city and our law."
So, Now u get idea to be prepare about these situations ...