Fbi Director: Hillary Clinton 'extremely Careless' But No Charges Recommended

Status
Not open for further replies.

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,431
Reaction score
549
(CNN) -- FBI Director James Comey said Tuesday that he would not recommend charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server while she was secretary of state -- but he added Clinton and her aides were "extremely careless" in handling classified information.

"Our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case," Comey announced after a lengthy recap of the investigation the FBI conducted.

Comey's decision not to recommend charges likely removes the threat of prosecution in the middle of Clinton's campaign for the presidency, but the political fallout will continue.

Comey delivered a stunning tongue-lashing of Clinton and her State Department colleagues. His stinging critique came just hours before Clinton is scheduled to campaign with President Barack Obama for the first time this election season.

"Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information," he said, "there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information."

In the first reaction from the Clinton camp to Comey' statement, spokesman Brian Fallon said that the campaign was "
pleased that the career officials handling this case have determined that no further action by the Department is appropriate.

"As the Secretary has long said, it was a mistake to use her personal email and she would not do it again. We are glad that this matter is now resolved."

Clinton's presumptive Republican opponent Donald Trump blasted Comey's decision an example of a rigged system.

"The system is rigged. General (David) Petraeus got in trouble for far less. Very very unfair! As usual, bad judgment," Trump tweeted.

And House Speaker Paul Ryan said Comey's announcement "defies explanation."

"No one should be above the law," Ryan said in a statement. "But based upon the director's own statement, it appears damage is being done to the rule of law. Declining to prosecute Secretary Clinton for recklessly mishandling and transmitting national security information will set a terrible precedent."

While the FBI is saying they are not recommending charges, the final decision rests with the Justice Department. That decision, ultimately, will be made by Attorney General Loretta Lynch who refused to recuse herself after a political furor arose over a chance meeting she had with President Bill Clinton. All indications are that decision will be accepted.

Last Friday, Lynch explained that the recommendation would be reviewed by "career supervisors" who will present to her the findings.

"I fully expect to accept their recommendations," Lynch said at an appearance last Friday in Aspen.

Comey made clear at the outset that he had not forewarned the Department of Justice or the administration what he was about to do.

"They do not know what I'm about to say," he said at the opening of his remarks.

Comey said that the FBI "painstakingly" combed through every bit of Clinton's multiple servers and mobile devices that they could from her four-year tenure as secretary of state. He described a series of obstacles, including for example a server that had its software wiped.

"It was like removing the frame from a huge jigsaw puzzle and then dumping all the pieces on the floor. ... We searched through all of it," he said.

Comey said of the 30,000 emails that Clinton's team turned over to the State Department, 110 emails in 52 email chains were determined to have contained classified information "at the time they were sent or received," Comey said. Eight of those chains contained information considered "top secret," the highest level of classification.

That's in addition to 2,000 emails that were "upclassified," or determined to have classified information only in hindsight.

Comey also said the FBI found "thousands" of emails that were work-related but deleted and not given to the State Department, either by regular purging by Clinton or officials during her tenure or mistaken deletion by her lawyers removing personal emails before turning over work-related emails to the State Department.

Three of those were classified at the time, he said.

However, Comey said there was not evidence of any kind of coverup in regards to those emails.

"We believe our investigation has been sufficient to give us reasonable confidence that there was no intentional misconduct in relation to that sorting effort," Comey said.

He also noted that while the FBI could find no direct evidence of an intrusion into Clinton's server by hostile foreign governments, given that she corresponded with individuals whose accounts were compromised and that the server was not secured by government protections, and that she used her email in hostile foreign territories, "It is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton's email account."

Ultimately, Comey said his recommendation against charges stems from the fact that there is no precedent for charging someone under similar circumstances.

"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case," Comey said, saying the FBI could not find a single case in which a person was charged with crimes for similar actions.

He also emphatically stated that the investigation was conducted fairly and unbiased.

"This investigation was done honestly, competently and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear," Comey said. "Opinions are irrelevant. ... We did our investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way."

http://www.foxcarolina.com/story/32...extremely-careless-but-no-charges-recommended
 
well...
i'm not surprised in the least....

so much for justice...or to use the term as they sue it
just-us

people have had their careers and lives ruined for doing far less then what this lady did..
she of course is untouchable
 
I'm not surprised, also there is a lot of political in this case.

Mistake, yes but criminal, no.
 
13620944_10157239685350389_6460665296722164965_n.jpg
 
I am disturbed over this. The media is praising this *deleted* all the time! WTH? But, us smart ones see right thru the MSM, we may be dhh, but not fooled.
 
I'm not surprised, also there is a lot of political in this case.

Mistake, yes but criminal, no.

her mistakes event he feds state where careless. so the question is why have some crook like her as careless as her in the white house.
does america deserve carless for a leader?

lets hope not

its a rather harsh world.

as for not criminal.
again people have had their lives ruined for doing less..but they of course were not clinton...
anyway its her turn
shes entitled to the throne..
lets get on with the farse and facade shall we..
 
her mistakes event he feds state where careless. so the question is why have some crook like her as careless as her in the white house.
does america deserve carless for a leader?

lets hope not

its a rather harsh world.

as for not criminal.
again people have had their lives ruined for doing less..but they of course were not clinton...
anyway its her turn
shes entitled to the throne..
lets get on with the farse and facade shall we..

All politicians are doing careless jobs nowadays.

Overall, that's not my problem so don't ask me.
 
All politicians are doing careless jobs nowadays.

Overall, that's not my problem so don't ask me.

do all politicians do what she did? in regards to what the fbi stated she was "extremely careless" about?

i'm just stating.
if the feds are correct and she was indeed "extremely careless," their words, that in itself in a world not gone mad should be enough to disqualify her from leading the free world.

being extremely careless when faced with guy like putin as an example is NOT in our best interests.

what jobs will hire you when you have "extremely careless" on your resume?
why the hell should the presidency?

these are the very words from the feds. in regards to what she did.
every time people of he ilk get away with criminal acts, it eats like a cancer through society...a society that has over a million people incarcerated...

it doesn't phase them...
they are above you and me and apparently and obviously the law..

the free world has put up clinton and trump as the choices to lead it...

this is does not bode well...

(drags joint, the smoke rises, as mushroom clouds, or kardashian depends on the angle.i shake my head.....)
 
The less I say about Hillary, the better my chances of not locking this threat or getting banned.
 
Why are you continue to discuss? You can't change my opinion.

I clearly said that all politicans, including Clinton made mistake all time, period. Criminal is only one way to disqualify the political career, not mistakes so voters have decide to elect whoever, even voters still elected the corrupted politicans.

Feel free to rant whatever you want but I don't care.

I'm going vote Hillary over Trump. ;)

do all politicians do what she did? in regards to what the fbi stated she was "extremely careless" about?

i'm just stating.
if the feds are correct and she was indeed "extremely careless," their words, that in itself in a world not gone mad should be enough to disqualify her from leading the free world.

being extremely careless when faced with guy like putin as an example is NOT in our best interests.

what jobs will hire you when you have "extremely careless" on your resume?
why the hell should the presidency?

these are the very words from the feds. in regards to what she did.
every time people of he ilk get away with criminal acts, it eats like a cancer through society...a society that has over a million people incarcerated...

it doesn't phase them...
they are above you and me and apparently and obviously the law..

the free world has put up clinton and trump as the choices ot lead it...

this is doe snot bode well...

(drags joint, the smoke rises, as mushroom clouds, or kardashian depends on the angle.i shake my head.....)
 
All politicians are doing careless jobs nowadays.
But not all, it seems there are more corrupt politicians than not. I am in Illinois, the House Speaker, Madigan is nasty...way too much power in one person, to make matters worse...his daughter Lisa Madigan is the States Attorney.
 
But not all, it seems there are more corrupt politicians than not. I am in Illinois, the House Speaker, Madigan is nasty...way too much power in one person, to make matters worse...his daughter Lisa Madigan is the States Attorney.

We have same issue in Alabama, also Mike Hubbard is convicted on corruption charges.
 
Why are you continue to discuss? You can't change my opinion.

I clearly said that all politicians, including Clinton made mistake all time, period. Criminal is only one way to disqualify the political career, not mistakes so voters have decide to elect whoever, even voters still elected corrupted politicans.

Feel free to rant whatever you want but I don't care.

I'm going vote Hillary over Trump. ;)

im not trying o change your opinion brother. im just trying to have a discussion on what actually this elitist bitch did.
even if i concede and accept she only did mistakes. i'm asking with mistakes like that on her resume what job will hire you?

its a fair question

i dont even think mcdonalds would with the "extremely careless" on it,,,

its just a chat foxroc. something to explore and think about thats all
anyway
always a pleasure to chat with you..regardless of our difference sin this issue, we agree more often though believe it or not..on other things..
just not the hildabeast
 
We have same issue in Alabama, also Mike Hubbard is convicted on corruption charges.
Do you hate that? I sure do. Here in Illinois, we have no control over term limits...they can go on forever...We cannot even do recalls!! How f'ed is that?
 
I have only one comment on that, I respect your vote. I am going for Trump.

if only tommy chong was running....
those three in a debate..
damn..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top