'Father' marries 'son' after they dissolve adoption

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,431
Reaction score
549
(NEWSER) – Norman MacArthur and Bill Novak spent the past 15 years as father and son in the eyes of the law; they'll spend the rest of their years as a married couple.

The couple, together for more than 50 years, married in Pennsylvania on Sunday, Yahoo News reports. Prior to the ceremony, the men told Patch.com they were "ecstatic beyond belief."

Novak adopted MacArthur in 2000 after the pair moved from New York to Pennsylvania and realized their legal partnership wouldn't be recognized. "The only legal avenue we had in order to be afforded any rights was adoption," MacArthur says.

The "creative" strategy is "entirely understandable," a lawyer says. "It reflects people's deep need to protect each other as family."

When a court agreed to dissolve their adoption this month so the men could marry, "The courtroom burst into applause. I burst into tears," MacArthur tells the AP. "They were certainly happy tears.

After months of investigating ways that we could do this and finally having the decision coming down in our favor, I'm still walking 3 feet above the ground."

This first case of an adoption-turned-marriage in the state "removes the hurdle for other people who may be in the same position as Bill and Norm," the couple's attorney says. He's already representing another couple hoping to vacate an adoption in order to tie the knot. (Read more about MacArthur and Novak here.)

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/story/news/nation/2015/05/28/newser/28064115/
 
It seems to me that the original adoption was bogus and should have been denied in the first place. It was obviously not a father-son relationship 15 years ago. If it were, then it would be considered incestuous.

What's to prevent any other adoptive pair from dissolving their adoption and then marrying? Mother-son, mother-daughter, father-son, father-daughter, of any age combination would be allowed to marry.

What idiot judge approved the adoption of one middle-aged man by another middle-aged man 15 years ago?

I don't call it a creative strategy; I call it deceptive manipulation.
 
Is it surprise? Not certainly.

If you ban on gay marriage or getting government involved in marriage business so people will find way to be together, such as adoption.
 
Admit. I was surprised...People find all kinds of ways to beat the system, but this was a 1st for me. Together 15 years?...That's almost a record in today's standards....so I don't knock it.....My motto?...Live and Let Live....not my business.
 
Admit. I was surprised...People find all kinds of ways to beat the system, but this was a 1st for me. Together 15 years?...That's almost a record in today's standards....so I don't knock it.....My motto?...Live and Let Live....not my business.

It isn't new to me because I heard that some people did like that for years.
 
It seems to me that the original adoption was bogus and should have been denied in the first place. It was obviously not a father-son relationship 15 years ago. If it were, then it would be considered incestuous.

What's to prevent any other adoptive pair from dissolving their adoption and then marrying? Mother-son, mother-daughter, father-son, father-daughter, of any age combination would be allowed to marry.

What idiot judge approved the adoption of one middle-aged man by another middle-aged man 15 years ago?

I don't call it a creative strategy; I call it deceptive manipulation.

Yeah it is deceptive manipulation and gross.
 
Meh....
What ever foats youe boat,..different strokes for different folks....
Good for them.
 
Even though my personal opinion, they are :crazy: but do I own them? Do I really have any business with them? If none of them is true then I have no fvcking business in their lives. So therefore, I ain't judging them and its really none of my God given business.
 
Back
Top