Facebook should shut down??

Phillips

Lets ride horses!
Premium Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
11,162
Reaction score
1
my friend told me that facebook>>>maybe will shut down? :dunno2:

cuz of fraud??
 
I just log on fb today and hear nothign of this prank story.

U gotta link?
 
rme! nothing new same with aim issue, aol issue, myspace issue, and now this! rme!

same thing.. it fraud.. fool around..
idoit people to spread that word!

i dont believe that anyway
 
scam.jpg
 
No sense.....
Someone made up story. They made you believe his/her story.
Please stop buy their story.
 
My friend give me link and I found it in facebook

check out here :dunno2:

THEY ARE TRYING TO SHUT DOWN FACEBOOK - PETITION TO KEEP IT! INVITE ALL! | Facebook


US judge backs Facebook deal in suit over origins - Boston.com



June 26, 2008
SAN FRANCISCO—Facebook agreed to pay an undisclosed amount of cash and stock to settle a long- running legal battle over whether founder Mark Zuckerberg stole ideas for the site from fellow Harvard students, according to court documents released late Wednesday.

The parties in the case -- which pitted Zuckerberg, a shy 24-year-old entrepreneur now worth billions of dollars, against former Harvard classmates and one-time U.S. Olympic team rowing hopefuls Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss -- agreed to a tentative settlement deal in February, according to the court papers.

The settlement agreement was delayed by a subsequent challenge by the Winklevosses, who argued the deal was incomplete and that Facebook had committed fraud by failing to disclose crucial documents related to Zuckerberg's actions.

On Wednesday, Judge James Ware of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California rejected those claims and ruled the settlement is enforceable and ordered the parties to a July 2 hearing to determine how to carry out the deal.

Facebook, begun as an online version of the introductory picture book first-year students at Harvard received to get acquainted with fellow students, has exploded into a worldwide phenomenon over the past four years for allowing Web users to share private details with a select group of their friends.

The dispute centered on accusations Zuckerberg copied ideas for Facebook after being hired as a Harvard University sophomore by the Winklevoss brothers and a third partner to write code for a site called Harvard Connection.

Through the settlement, Facebook effectively agreed to buy ConnectU, the successor company to Harvard Connection founded by the Winklevoss brothers, partner Divya Narendra, for cash and common stock.

Terms of the deal were confidential and the Winklevosses, Narendra and ConnectU agreed to make no future claims. The court agreed to seal the financial terms of the settlement.

Among the claims made by the Winklevosses in seeking to derail the settlement was that their father, Howard Winklevoss, an owner of a one percent share in ConnectU, had not been party to the agreement. Judge Ware ruled that, as a minor shareholder, his agreement to the settlement was unnecessary.

A spokesman for Facebook said the settlement deal, once finalized, would end separate, but related cases the two sides had been pursuing in courts in Boston and San Jose.

"The ConnectU founders understood the deal they made, and we are gratified that the Court rejected their false allegations of fraud," Facebook said in a statement. "Their challenge was simply a case of 'buyers remorse,' as described by the Boston Court earlier this month."

Facebook said it believed one factor holding up a settlement is a separate dispute between the Winklevosses and their original team of lawyers over their handling of the case. Facebook said it considered the ConnectU dispute closed.

Facebook had counter-sued, accusing the plaintiffs of breaking into its computers to steal member lists.

These lawsuits were first filed in September 2004 by the Winklevosses and ConnectU against Facebook, Zuckerberg and his co-founders. It alleged breach of contract and that Zuckerberg misappropriated trade secrets, among other complaints.

Thefacebook.com, as it was then known, was set up in early 2004 as a social site for Harvard students, but had already spread to other U.S. college campuses, attracting hundreds of thousands of members by the time the lawsuit was first filed.

Court papers filed by ConnectU state that Zuckerberg agreed to work for Harvard Connection founders Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss and Divya Narendra, then dragged his feet before launching Thefacebook.com in February 2004.

In the four years since then, the student phenomenon spread across the United States and the world. Two years ago, Facebook, which has relocated to Palo Alto, California, opened up the site to members of all ages.

Facebook has become Silicon Valley's hottest start-up company over the past year as it has catapulted to become the world's largest social network site, surpassing rival MySpace, a unit of News Corp, according to recent international monthly data from market researcher comScore Inc
 
I like FB WAAAAAAAAAAAAY better than Myspace...so I sure hope nothing happens to FB!
 
Probably same person who try to make bull con about all president. At least, the reporter or whatever he/she make true about Paris Hilton. Awesome!
 
they had the same old talk about Myspace shutting down. :scoffs:
 
Mate, why does facebook upgraded its new look, hmm?
 
I saw that on the TV a couple of months ago. Actually, he collected many yearbooks at the college's library without a permission. He did not have the authorization to do that, but somehow he did it all the work and put them on his website. That's how he started his Facebook business.

Generally, Bill Gate gave him some millions of dollars to support his company.

Now, I think that Mark will be in a big trouble with the law because of one main reason that those people in the yearbook did not ask him to put their portrait on his website for a security reason. That's his grave mistake.

On other side for Bill Gate, he did not care about that because he is not involved in Mark's business. Just because Mark is very young so Bill was also young as a troubled kid at school. Bill's personal way that he likes to help young people who are under 21 years old and they have a website business. You will see his way on the news once a while.

Mark knew that he was wrong at the being, but he wanted to do it on his purpose in order to make money. I think that he is just a sick young man as a peeper. I don't hate him. He is just doing very wrong thing to do.
 
even if it ever did, a newer and better one would just pop uo and reap the rewards anyway.
 
I had missed it that read, good thing that I don't read it, so I won't be upsetting.
 
Back
Top