Do we understand the deaf?

Kalista

New Member
Premium Member
Joined
May 20, 2003
Messages
7,926
Reaction score
4
by Julie Jumbo


Have you ever met a deaf person before? If you have, what was your immediate reaction?

Undoubtedly, many people are bewildered on their first encounter with a deaf person partly because his handicap is not visible and partly because they know so little about the deaf.

The little they know is often very misleading. I want to correct the many twisted opinions held about deaf people.

A broad classification divides the deaf into two main categories. There are those who were either deaf from birth or became deaf in early infancy.

These are referred to as the pre-lingually deaf because they become deaf before they could learn to talk. The second category embraces those who became deaf later in life and after acquiring speech skills.

Rarely are pre-lingually deaf persons able to talk since speech development depends largely on the ability of a child to hear speech, sounds around him.

But pre-lingually deaf persons are often able to talk.

However, the intelligibility of such a person's speech depends largely on the severity of the hearing loss.

If it is severe, ordinary people may find it difficult to follow the victims speech.

This is because the absence of the hearing sensation causes the victim to lose control of the voice important aspects of voice production such as pitch, rhythm, stress and intonation will not be properly brought under control.

Therefore just as the blind is handicapped by immobilisation of the handicapped by inability to communicate with the world.

Communication is one of the most vital things that binds people together. Ability to communicate effectively with people is important for ensuring the acceptance of an individual into any level of society.

An individual that cannot communicate with the people around him for whatever reason is certain to be ignored as a total bore.

Thus the deaf and dumb in a hearing society; are ignored and left to their fate.

The social implications of deafness vary from country to country.

But they all follow the same pattern, that is the average deaf person is not considered as an integral member of the society. He is expected to stay at the other side of the wall.

For any one to understand the full implications of deafness, it requires nothing short of a sudden transition from a world of gay voices, music and general sounds of nature to a sordid world of silence.

Although the physical hindrances that go with deafness are perhaps the least of all the other types of handicaps, the psychological effect on the victim could be the greatest if not checked.

Dialogue

You will get a slight idea of what it means to be deaf if you turn down the volume of your television set to the minimum and then move away to a distance of about ten metres and attempt to keep up with the dialogue going on.

You will then understand why it is difficult for deaf persons to take part in group discussions.

The inability to join in conversations is the reason why some deaf and dumb persons would appear with drawn or on the defensive when in the company of normally hearing people and is often mistaken for stupidity or absence of ideas.

This creates an embarrassing wall of ice between the deaf and those he encounters in his day to day l ife.

But does society ever lead a hand in breaking down the barrier that separates the deaf from it.

Apart from the feeble attempts by a few concerned people, nobody appears to give a damn.

Deafness is an invisible handicap that is, you can walk right past a deaf person on a quiet street and never know be is deaf.

You can sit next to him in a bus or taxi and never detect his condition unless some one addresses him. But you can know a blind man by means of his stick or escort. You can spot a lame man by means of his crutches and by seeing his affected limb. For this reason the deaf receives the least sympathy from the public.

This perfectly suits most of the dead person I know. Being fairly educated they dislike the least show of pity even from members of their families.

They many people do not realise they are not really as helpless as they are thought to be.

What many people do not realise or refuse to accept is that a n individual though handicapped still have dignity, aspires to great heights and reacts to circumstances in the same way as anyone else.

Inspite of the tendency to appear withdrawn when in the company of normally hearing people the deaf are among the best conservationists in the world.

Among themselves, they could talk on for hours (usually using the American sign language) about the only recognised non-oral language ranging from religion to politics to sports.

One significant aspect of group discussion among the deaf is the quality and liveliness of such discussions.

One cannot dispute the fact that the most frequent subject of conversation in our society today is women.

Personality

The deaf are not exposed to such conversation and therefore, their discussions do not follow that pattern.

Unfortunately, many people today, know next to nothing about the personality of the deaf and therefore, treats them with indifference at times.

Our society needs to learn to integrate not only the deaf but also those handicapped in other ways.

Otherwise, it will be thwarting the government's efforts to provide as much opportunity as possible for the handicapped to find their places in life.

Or how can we be at ease if after government has taken pains and spent money to rehabilitate and educate him to find himself ostracised and ignored in a society that follows strictly the principle of survival of the fittest?

The average Nigeria would thank God for being made perfectly normal' and boost his own ego at the expense of the less fortunate members of society.

I hope that in the not too distant future, our society will learn to integrate its handicapped members keeping in mind that they desire not pity but understanding.
 
I think whoever wrote this has his or her heart in the right place, but a lot of it rubs me the wrong way. But it's probably a cultural thing. Perhaps Nigeria has a lot more catching up to do when it comes to acceptance of Deaf culture, or even just deaf people.
 
Interpretrator said:
I think whoever wrote this has his or her heart in the right place, but a lot of it rubs me the wrong way. But it's probably a cultural thing. Perhaps Nigeria has a lot more catching up to do when it comes to acceptance of Deaf culture, or even just deaf people.

That's kind of what I was thinking...a lot of it was VERY politically-incorrect had it been written by an American, but it could at least be a wake-up call there.
 
"Deaf and dumb" is still a perfectly acceptable term in many countries. It's important not to judge everything from an American Deaf cultural standpoint. But it's hard not to have a visceral reaction based on an American Deaf cultural standpoint.
 
Interpretrator said:
"Deaf and dumb" is still a perfectly acceptable term in many countries. It's important not to judge everything from an American Deaf cultural standpoint. But it's hard not to have a visceral reaction based on an American Deaf cultural standpoint.
"Deaf and dumb" is not perfectly acceptable term in many countries to Deaf or Hard of hearing.

That word "Deaf and Dumb" refers to uneducated hearing people. They should know that “Deaf and dumb” or “Deaf and Mute” or “Hearing Impaired” are "expired", "vacant", "inappropriate" or now known as "insolent" words. There is a suitable or appropriate way to say that they are “hard of hearing” or “Deaf” just to be polite and respectful. I guess it's not their fault; it's their education system's fault.

They all need to be educated about deaf in hearing or deaf school. I remembered I was in a health class in 10 grades, my teacher boldly told the class to skip a page about deaf front of me. That furious me… Also 4 years ago my baby sister in her six grades, her teacher told the whole class that deaf is a disease... That double-furious me...
 
Demise said:
"Deaf and dumb" is not perfectly acceptable term in many countries to Deaf or Hard of hearing.
...

Er...Interpretator was just saying they (other countries) don't see anything wrong with it. I understand what you are trying to say and I agree education goes a long way to straightening many misconceptions people have especially related to the issues of deafness. Unfortunately, education isn't the only aspect of the equation. There is also the cultural aspect which can make the whole thing problematical. As you state, there are still many misunderstandings in this country for all its education!!!
 
sr171soars said:
Er...Interpretator was just saying they (other countries) don't see anything wrong with it.

Correct. I'm not saying if you go to England it's fine to call someone "deaf and dumb," but you will still see this term used there, and in other countries, in many professional situations where in the U.S. we would never DREAM of still saying that. (Heck, we're still trying to drag people back from labelling everyone "hearing impaired.")

My point was just that when you see the term "deaf and dumb" you have to think about who is using it before you automatically assume it's an insult. In this country I would say it's used as an insult or by the HIGHLY ignorant. In other countries, it may be the acceptable term, and thus we shouldn't take offense...even though we want to.

I probably just made myself even less clear with this explanation.
 
Interpretrator said:
My point was just that when you see the term "deaf and dumb" you have to think about who is using it before you automatically assume it's an insult. In this country I would say it's used as an insult or by the HIGHLY ignorant. In other countries, it may be the acceptable term, and thus we shouldn't take offense...even though we want to.

The other thing to note is that dumb used to mean "unspeaking", as opposed to "of low intelligence" (as in, 'struck dumb with surprise'). English has not evolved in the same way in every country. Note: I'm not sure of the specific situation in Nigeria.

If I were breeding dogs in another country, might non-native speakers be shocked at how I refer to my female dogs? Sure - but bitch *is* the correct term for a mother dog in breeding programs.
 
I thought "Hearing Impared" was an acceptable term... (but i am hearing myself! lol) please enlighten me on what the prefered 'term/label' i should use in the future..is the correct term "hard of hearing"? (eg for an elderly person who has lost their hearing later in life)...i do not like to offend..
 
MEZZA said:
I thought "Hearing Impared" was an acceptable term... (but i am hearing myself! lol) please enlighten me on what the prefered 'term/label' i should use in the future..is the correct term "hard of hearing"? (eg for an elderly person who has lost their hearing later in life)...i do not like to offend..

Don't use the phrase 'hearing impaired'. This implies that something is broken. You're right about 'hard of hearing' for a senior citizen who has lost their hearing.

There's a book called For Hearing People Only by Harlan Lane, Matthew S. Moore, and Linda Levitan. It's an introduction that I recommend to anyone trying to learn more.
 
MEZZA said:
I thought "Hearing Impared" was an acceptable term... (but i am hearing myself! lol) please enlighten me on what the prefered 'term/label' i should use in the future..is the correct term "hard of hearing"? (eg for an elderly person who has lost their hearing later in life)...i do not like to offend..


It is from Niegera, Afraican Deaf people do accept themselves to using term "Hearing Impaired". I really hate, they label me as H.I. Yucky.

I am glad, you brought this up. Thanks ;)
 
ITPjohn said:
Don't use the phrase 'hearing impaired'. This implies that something is broken. You're right about 'hard of hearing' for a senior citizen who has lost their hearing.

Here's a question for you though. Suppose the senior citizen was 100% hearing culture only and preferred to call himself "hearing impaired." Would you insist on calling him "hard of hearing"?

I'm not arguing or trying to start a fight, I'm just curious.
 
Interpretrator said:
Here's a question for you though. Suppose the senior citizen was 100% hearing culture only and preferred to call himself "hearing impaired." Would you insist on calling him "hard of hearing"?

This is something I'd be interested to hear a reaction on.

For me, I am in hearing culture; the closest I come to Deaf culture is identifying strongly as disabled (mostly through my other disability). I've always used "hearing impaired" in the past; deaf is not my identity, nor do most hearing people understand what that means (i.e., since I do hear and speak, I think it would be too confusing). HOH, on the other hand, carries connotations of age-related hearing loss: grumpy old men and/or a "mild" self-diagnosed hearing loss that really isn't an impairment at all. So that doesn't fit me either.

Hearing impaired, on the other hand, has worked perfectly for me. It has the connotation of a significant impairment (which is *not* a negative thing) without all the baggage that hearing people attach to "I'm deaf".
 
Interpretrator said:
Here's a question for you though. Suppose the senior citizen was 100% hearing culture only and preferred to call himself "hearing impaired." Would you insist on calling him "hard of hearing"?

I'm not arguing or trying to start a fight, I'm just curious.

For a senior citizen "hearing impaired" might be appropriate. From everything that I've heard (no pun intended), the Deaf/deaf community prefers Deaf or hard of hearing. There's nothing 'impaired'. Your best best when in doubt is to ask the person how he or she wants to be described.
 
ITPjohn said:
Your best best when in doubt is to ask the person how he or she wants to be described.

Yup, that's what I do, and why I was curious to see your response. Basically however anyone self-identifies, I go with that.
 
MEZZA said:
I thought "Hearing Impared" was an acceptable term... (but i am hearing myself! lol) please enlighten me on what the prefered 'term/label' i should use in the future..is the correct term "hard of hearing"? (eg for an elderly person who has lost their hearing later in life)...i do not like to offend..
"Deaf" and "hard of hearing" are your safest bets when being general, but when talking to/about someone, you should ask the person. Typically "deaf" is for people with no usable hearing and/or function like "deaf people" (that is, visually and/or with tactile communication), and "hard of hearing" is typically used for people who have mild to moderate hearing loss and function more like hearing people. There are exceptions, so pay attention to people's preferences.

"Hearing impaired" is often viewed as an insult because some view it as walking around or denying a characteristic of that person (because it is a euphemism), and some see it as calling deaf people "broken".
 
gnulinuxman said:
Typically "deaf" is for people with no usable hearing and/or function like "deaf people" (that is, visually and/or with tactile communication), and "hard of hearing" is typically used for people who have mild to moderate hearing loss and function more like hearing people.

You do realize that there's a huge gap between these two groups, right?
 
Kalista said:
by Julie Jumbo


Have you ever met a deaf person before? If you have, what was your immediate reaction?

Undoubtedly, many people are bewildered on their first encounter with a deaf person partly because his handicap is not visible and partly because they know so little about the deaf.

The little they know is often very misleading. I want to correct the many twisted opinions held about deaf people.

A broad classification divides the deaf into two main categories. There are those who were either deaf from birth or became deaf in early infancy.

These are referred to as the pre-lingually deaf because they become deaf before they could learn to talk. The second category embraces those who became deaf later in life and after acquiring speech skills.

Rarely are pre-lingually deaf persons able to talk since speech development depends largely on the ability of a child to hear speech, sounds around him.

But pre-lingually deaf persons are often able to talk.

However, the intelligibility of such a person's speech depends largely on the severity of the hearing loss.

If it is severe, ordinary people may find it difficult to follow the victims speech.

This is because the absence of the hearing sensation causes the victim to lose control of the voice important aspects of voice production such as pitch, rhythm, stress and intonation will not be properly brought under control.

Therefore just as the blind is handicapped by immobilisation of the handicapped by inability to communicate with the world.

Communication is one of the most vital things that binds people together. Ability to communicate effectively with people is important for ensuring the acceptance of an individual into any level of society.

An individual that cannot communicate with the people around him for whatever reason is certain to be ignored as a total bore.

Thus the deaf and dumb in a hearing society; are ignored and left to their fate.

The social implications of deafness vary from country to country.

But they all follow the same pattern, that is the average deaf person is not considered as an integral member of the society. He is expected to stay at the other side of the wall.

For any one to understand the full implications of deafness, it requires nothing short of a sudden transition from a world of gay voices, music and general sounds of nature to a sordid world of silence.

Although the physical hindrances that go with deafness are perhaps the least of all the other types of handicaps, the psychological effect on the victim could be the greatest if not checked.

Dialogue

You will get a slight idea of what it means to be deaf if you turn down the volume of your television set to the minimum and then move away to a distance of about ten metres and attempt to keep up with the dialogue going on.

You will then understand why it is difficult for deaf persons to take part in group discussions.

The inability to join in conversations is the reason why some deaf and dumb persons would appear with drawn or on the defensive when in the company of normally hearing people and is often mistaken for stupidity or absence of ideas.

This creates an embarrassing wall of ice between the deaf and those he encounters in his day to day l ife.

But does society ever lead a hand in breaking down the barrier that separates the deaf from it.

Apart from the feeble attempts by a few concerned people, nobody appears to give a damn.

Deafness is an invisible handicap that is, you can walk right past a deaf person on a quiet street and never know be is deaf.

You can sit next to him in a bus or taxi and never detect his condition unless some one addresses him. But you can know a blind man by means of his stick or escort. You can spot a lame man by means of his crutches and by seeing his affected limb. For this reason the deaf receives the least sympathy from the public.

This perfectly suits most of the dead person I know. Being fairly educated they dislike the least show of pity even from members of their families.

They many people do not realise they are not really as helpless as they are thought to be.

What many people do not realise or refuse to accept is that a n individual though handicapped still have dignity, aspires to great heights and reacts to circumstances in the same way as anyone else.

Inspite of the tendency to appear withdrawn when in the company of normally hearing people the deaf are among the best conservationists in the world.

Among themselves, they could talk on for hours (usually using the American sign language) about the only recognised non-oral language ranging from religion to politics to sports.

One significant aspect of group discussion among the deaf is the quality and liveliness of such discussions.

One cannot dispute the fact that the most frequent subject of conversation in our society today is women.

Personality

The deaf are not exposed to such conversation and therefore, their discussions do not follow that pattern.

Unfortunately, many people today, know next to nothing about the personality of the deaf and therefore, treats them with indifference at times.

Our society needs to learn to integrate not only the deaf but also those handicapped in other ways.

Otherwise, it will be thwarting the government's efforts to provide as much opportunity as possible for the handicapped to find their places in life.

Or how can we be at ease if after government has taken pains and spent money to rehabilitate and educate him to find himself ostracised and ignored in a society that follows strictly the principle of survival of the fittest?

The average Nigeria would thank God for being made perfectly normal' and boost his own ego at the expense of the less fortunate members of society.

I hope that in the not too distant future, our society will learn to integrate its handicapped members keeping in mind that they desire not pity but understanding.


What's to be understood about deafness ? Is it some mystical thing ? a rarity ? a holy grail to be aspired to or desired ? I just wish they would see we are basically just people like anyone else, who happen to be unable to hear. Let's talk people not cultures and modes.
 
Back
Top