http://www.msmagazine.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=14;t=002597
Found this article on a site I lurk at (used to post, but my account accidently got deleted) The comments on the thread really struck me.
Now the popular opinon in the Deaf world is that we're not "disabled", we just use a Signed language instead of a spoken language. We don't sit around whining that we can't hear or wishing that we could hear or sinking money into research for a cure.
Yet, many disabilty rights activists don't wish they could walk, or talk, or see or whatever.
Other thoughts, comments?
Found this article on a site I lurk at (used to post, but my account accidently got deleted) The comments on the thread really struck me.
Now the popular opinon in the Deaf world is that we're not "disabled", we just use a Signed language instead of a spoken language. We don't sit around whining that we can't hear or wishing that we could hear or sinking money into research for a cure.
Yet, many disabilty rights activists don't wish they could walk, or talk, or see or whatever.
Doctors are scientists working with the often completely unknowable and making educated guesses. And their education is biased against any acceptance of disability.
Disabilty rights activists see disabilty, NOT as "inabilty" but rather as a different way of doing something, like using a walker or a wheelchair instead of walking, or reading Braille instead of large print or using an ostomy instead of conventional methods of going to the bathroom, or whatever.The primary problems of physical disability for someone like me are not about the condition itself, but people's attitudes and judgments.
Other thoughts, comments?