Crossing the line from pet to service animal

rockin'robin

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2007
Messages
24,431
Reaction score
549
Many fliers avoid airline fees by misrepresenting their pet dogs as service animals, giving legitimate service animal owners a bad reputation.

Frequent business travelers and at least one airline say they have noticed an uptick in the number of service dogs in aircraft cabins, raising questions for others as to whether a number of dogs that are truly pets are being passed off as service dogs.

Such fliers don't want keep their dogs in a carrier case in the cabin or aim to avoid paying a fee for their pets, says Jeanne Hampl of the Assistance Dog Club of Puget Sound in Gig Harbor, Wash.

"There's so much fraud out there," says Hampl, secretary of the club, which helps members train service animals. "People do it all the time — say it's a service dog when it's not — and create so many access problems for people with legitimate service animals."

People with a legitimate need for a service dog may include blind individuals, paraplegics, amputees and others with "visible disabilities," but travelers with "invisible" disabilities — such as hearing or emotional problems, diabetes or seizures — may also need them, Hampl says.

Department of Transportation regulations require airlines to allow service dogs on flights without charge.
According to the regulations, passengers are permitted to board a flight with a service dog — other than one for emotional or psychiatric support — by presenting an airline with written documentation or providing "credible verbal assurances" that the dog is needed for a disability.

Airlines, the rules say, can limit service dogs for emotional and psychiatric support to passengers "with a diagnosed mental or emotional disorder." Airlines may require such passengers to provide documentation from a licensed mental health professional or a medical doctor

Department of Transportation spokeswoman Caitlin Harvey says the agency "has received some anecdotal reports of passengers traveling with service animals who appeared to some observers to have no disability."

Harvey cautions that "many disabilities are hidden, and passengers aren't required "to prove the legitimacy of their need for a service animal to other passengers."

Carol Glazer, president of the National Organization on Disability, says the use of service dogs "has expanded dramatically over the years." Service dogs "can help their owners function more effectively in life and in the workplace" and gain access to airplanes and other places "they couldn't otherwise navigate."

George Hurden, a USA TODAY Road Warrior, who volunteers travel information, says he has seen service animals on four of the 16 flights he has flown this year.

"I have seen some very healthy and capable-looking people with dogs in tow on flights and in airport lounges," says Hurden, who lives in Cheshire, Conn., and works in the plastics industry.

Some dogs traveling as service animals were "lap-sized" and appeared to be pets, he says.

"I have no problem with service dogs being able to travel with their owners," Hurden says. "They tend to be very well-behaved and mild-mannered."

Road Warrior Sally Smoczynski of Burr Ridge, Ill., is glad that service dogs enable their owners to fly and "be more independent."

Sometimes, though, she sees an owner "with no visible disability" accompanied by a small dog and wonders whether the animal is a legitimate service dog. Smoczynski, who works in the information security industry, says she has learned to not make a quick judgment.

"I have learned that being disabled and needing the use of a service animal does not require a physical disability," she says. "I work a lot in the Washington metro area where a lot of veterans and others suffer from crippling anxieties. These wonderfully trained dogs provide a great service."

JetBlue spokeswoman Tamara Young says the airline has seen an increase in emotional support and service animals on its flights but hasn't noticed an increase of fliers trying to misrepresent their pets as service animals.

Lee Shannon, a real estate agent In Park City, Utah, says she has "several times" seen people — including two she has traveled with — misrepresenting pets as service animals.

"It's a pet peeve of mine," she says.

Shannon says the people she traveled with were not trying to save money. They are pet lovers who simply wanted their dogs next to them or on their lap.

Saving money may be a motivation for many others.

"For most who try to falsely represent their animals as service dogs," Hampl says, "it's to save money."

WHAT IT COSTS

Airline fees for a dog in the passenger cabin and in the cargo hold on one-way domestic flights:

American Airlines: $125 cabin; $175 cargo hold

Delta Air Lines: $125; $200

Southwest Airlines: $95; dogs not allowed in cargo hold

United Airlines: $125; $189-$549, depending on weight of dog

Crossing the line from pet to service animal
 
It's sad that the fakers make things difficult for the people with real service animals. :(
 
I recently paid $95 a way for my dog from NJ to LV on Southwest airlines. He is not a hearing dog unfortunately. And he hates to be in a carrier.
 
I agree.. disappointed that some people who try to fake service animals give a bad name to legitimate ones. I'm kind of on the fence with service animals in general though but would never deny anyone the use of one.

I've read stories where some folks went as far as actually purchasing legitimate leashes/harnesses or items worn by the service dog for their pets...
 
I am firmly of the belief that self trained service dogs should not be permitted and only come from licensed agencies who train them, and the recipients should be required to go for training before obtaining their new service dog.
 
I tend to agree with you, Bott. Though I do not feel as strongly about having a self-trained dog for work in the home only, especially if the handler actually IS a actual, knowledgeable trainer.

The dog training field in general is very scattered/un-regulated....anyone can call themselves a trainer or behaviorist when they actually have little to no current and credible information for either.

I agree is it's frustrating for those with legitimate needs to be disenfranchised by those with fake service animals
 
TCS and I observed something interesting yesterday at the VA clinic (during one of my ugh appointments).

A middle-aged veteran was at the clinic with his service dog. It looked like a Corgi and Bassett, with pigeon-toed sitting position. Funny looking but cute. :)

Anyway, the dog was wearing a harness/vest combo that identified it as a service dog. That's not unusual. The unusual thing was the man was also wearing a service dog t-shirt! That is, it said something about he (the man) having PTSD, and his dog being a service dog. I'm not sure if it was more for the dog or more for the man (like, "Don't mess with me; I have PTSD and I might blow up!"). :dunno:
 
I am firmly of the belief that self trained service dogs should not be permitted and only come from licensed agencies who train them, and the recipients should be required to go for training before obtaining their new service dog.
The service animal center here, trains the dogs (rescues) then when ready they have the new owners come stay for 2 weeks of training with the service animal before they are released to the new owners. They will also get surprise visits during the first year and have to attend a meeting after the first year, if the new owners dont pass the observation at the meeting then the service animal is revoked.
 
The service animal center here, trains the dogs (rescues) then when ready they have the new owners come stay for 2 weeks of training with the service animal before they are released to the new owners. They will also get surprise visits during the first year and have to attend a meeting after the first year, if the new owners dont pass the observation at the meeting then the service animal is revoked.

I love that. That is a great way for it to work.

I saw a "service dog" in a restaurant with that purported to be for a soldier with PTSD.

It was very thin with it's skull bones showing way too prominently and was surreptitiously grabbing any crumb it could find off the floor. He also was being unkind to it.

It was very hard for me not to confront him, but I am in poor health, and am pretty sure from the way he was treating the dog, I would have come out poorly in the encounter.
 
As far as service animals they are not supposed to "want" food or beg for food, one of the guidlines for a service animal is not wanting food nor seeking/being distracted while working. If the pup was eating crumbs it had to be starved and with the looks you discribed, maybe the owner isnt capable of taking care of it properly. May have been wise to call APA or police to look into it?
 
As far as service animals they are not supposed to "want" food or beg for food, one of the guidlines for a service animal is not wanting food nor seeking/being distracted while working. If the pup was eating crumbs it had to be starved and with the looks you discribed, maybe the owner isnt capable of taking care of it properly. May have been wise to call APA or police to look into it?

In retrospect, I really should have.
 
TCS and I observed something interesting yesterday at the VA clinic (during one of my ugh appointments).

A middle-aged veteran was at the clinic with his service dog. It looked like a Corgi and Bassett, with pigeon-toed sitting position. Funny looking but cute. :)

Anyway, the dog was wearing a harness/vest combo that identified it as a service dog. That's not unusual. The unusual thing was the man was also wearing a service dog t-shirt! That is, it said something about he (the man) having PTSD, and his dog being a service dog. I'm not sure if it was more for the dog or more for the man (like, "Don't mess with me; I have PTSD and I might blow up!"). :dunno:

The guy might had gotten tried of telling people what his dog does for him, I am sure you can't tell he has PTSD just by looking at him. Some people may wonder why he need a service dog when he has no visible handicap.
I met a vet from Vietnam War. He was exposure to agent orange and was getting blackout spells . He had a service dog and people where always asking why he needed one b/c he was a big strong guy and looked healthy .
The told me he hated people keep asking him what he needed a service dog for.
 
As far as service animals they are not supposed to "want" food or beg for food, one of the guidlines for a service animal is not wanting food nor seeking/being distracted while working. If the pup was eating crumbs it had to be starved and with the looks you discribed, maybe the owner isnt capable of taking care of it properly. May have been wise to call APA or police to look into it?

Abusing, injuring or killing of service animal | Service Dog Central



"Sec. 4.04. Injuring or killing police animals, service animals, or search and rescue dogs prohibited. It shall be unlawful for any person to willfully or maliciously torture, mutilate, injure, disable, poison, or kill (i) any animal used by a law enforcement department or agency in the performance of the functions or duties of the department or agency or when placed in confinement off duty, (ii) any service animal, (iii) any search and rescue dog, or (iv) any law enforcement, service, or search and rescue animal in training. However, a police officer or veterinarian may perform euthanasia in emergency situations when delay would cause the animal undue suffering and pain.
A person convicted of violating this Section is guilty of a Class 4 felony if the animal is not killed or totally disabled; if the animal is killed or totally disabled, the person is guilty of a Class 3 felony."


A service dog has the same protection as a police dog and the owner will be fined too for abusing their service dog.
 
Back
Top