If he can take care of the kids better than she can then they need to be with the father..... Not a subject of who is being a gold digger, it is a subject of who can care for the children better..
I have not paid attention to how he drives. If the court found he was reckless with his children, they would not be with the father....
Why did the mother turn against her own child? I'm sure they're some deeper issues on why the mother turned against her. Not only by his suggestions.
I agree any parent that doesn't pay child support to the custodial parent is a scumbag. But he is the father with rights and the courts find he is doing better and able to take better care of the children than Britney then that where they need to be.
Not an issue of Aww what a great guy...It is an issue of poor kids being passed back and forth.
In your opinion Banjo...where would you place these children??
