If you go back to the first post you will see I really do not have an argument, I found it a bit ironic that the author was bashing science using science. Yes, it was sticking to the rules of his argument, but still a bit ironic.
Chemistry came in because I stated I find it a more soild science the social sciences.
Chemistry does have some aspect of the human factor in the observation yet social sciences are almost completely human dealt... chemistry... to put it in perspective of the article does not have a wall paper effect.
As for color, without having an experiment to go with it is all fictional anyways so it not working or does, really is not a big deal for me.
