It is important to stick within the rules and constraints of a given topic such as sicene. But within his findings and arguments is the author not admitting to the fact that the chances of his argument being wrong?
Social Science is not as solid as physical science. It is why I like chemistry so much.
Medicine had too much of a social aspect to it that it does bring CI into question. The part of the article about peer review does highlight what happens to anyone who says anything negative about the so called miraculous nature of a billion dollar industry that actually does not do all it promises... reminds me very much of the weatherman...
