whatdidyousay!
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 19, 2009
- Messages
- 29,358
- Reaction score
- 813
Seems like much ado about nothing. He said only that they wouldn't use a gay family for advertising their product.
I don't know why he said that; did the interviewer ask him about advertising or gay issues?you're wrong , comments like this could stir up antigay feelings . I guess you forgot about Anita Bryant antigay movement and how that stirred up people. I know the guy has a right to say anything he want, but was it really necessary to made this statement .
I don't know why he said that; did the interviewer ask him about advertising or gay issues?
I don't know about any anti-gay feelings being stirred up. It didn't do that to me. AD is the only place where I've seen this mentioned.
Is there going to be a boycott for every product that doesn't use a gay family in its advertising?
Well, he has the right to his marketing decisions, and consumers have the right to their purchasing decisions.coming right and said he would not use gay families in his ads does not sound like a very wise business move to me. this could be taken as an insult, that gay people money is not good enough for him. This could be why people are boycotting the pasta company. And it made me wonder what other 'anti' feeling the guy has.
Of course, this boycott can backfire like the one against Chick-fil-A.