Reply to thread

I appreciate your time.  It's not just for me but for others that read these threads in the future.  You have to understand that for something that is this important (at least to me it is) folks should be able to have credible information to base decisions on.  It's not that I don't believe what you and others say, it's that it would only be fair for other people to be able to have the original studies so they may consider them for validity just as you do when others cite reference studies.  There is nothing wrong with that.  I believe that anything other than a credible study that meets criteria set forth by peers in the profession should not be taken that seriously. IMHO.