Search results

  1. DefMATRIXense

    Marlee Matlin, NAD, and Purple!

    I am sorry but "captioned internet"? Educate me what is captioned internet?
  2. DefMATRIXense

    Declining Purple Stock!!

    since FCC said no, investors want out unless purple needs find another way.
  3. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    Oh!! I thought I am crazy lol
  4. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    Three VP devices connected each other or I'm dumbass. I gotta check the node things and how it works.
  5. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    what are you trying to say? Enlighten me up!!!
  6. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    I agree with you lmao.
  7. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    Comcast is doing illegal and not following FCC rules even though there is no rule under Internet act or whatever. So FCC took action against comcast only. Right now I don't see why purple is concerning about FCC taking action against vrs or whatever because there is nothing going on. Let us know...
  8. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    I agree with you but purple is fighting FCC over video conference deaf to deaf not deaf to hearing. Have u notice why sorenson and other didn't say or support purple because they are against it and not necessary waste money. Wise choice!!!
  9. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    No this is not what Kelby talking about vrs. He was talking about video conference deaf to deaf. It has nothing do with vrs. Edit: wrong video lol he is asking for rules clarification. Dumb me!! Lol
  10. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    I hate to say but yes as long as there is no any fund left.
  11. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    No, they wouldn't because taxpayers pay to help people with disabilities. You can see the paycheck, phone bill, or other bill that shows relay service fund and that people have to pay like 3 or 7 cents per month.
  12. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    This communication Act that has do with deaf people who can't HEAR anything. Video conference is a different because deaf people who can SEE anything which is not applied Communication Act.
  13. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    If not, don't get a video conference at all period.
  14. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    Thats what I answered your question. Deaf owners should have to pay thier own pockets if they want deaf to deaf confence. It's not fair to hearing people to pay. That's why FCC decided against it.
  15. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    No,you are right. Now it does make sense and why purple is an anal over this issue because investors lent the purple a lot of money and they expected to get money back plus interests or some kind of agreement between the purple and the investors.
  16. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    I disagreed with this. It's not fair to hearing people because you can see to other deaf person via VIDEO.
  17. DefMATRIXense

    Purple upset FCC says 'NO'

    First of all, you have to be aware that there is a hell of an expensive to use a video conference to video conference and that's why a big companies like a million dollar companies. Now since you asked for it, here it is First, you need a great or T1 connection $100 or up a month Second...
  18. DefMATRIXense

    New iPhone 4

    Ha ha ha!!!
  19. DefMATRIXense

    New iPhone 4

    sweet!!!!!!
  20. DefMATRIXense

    New iPhone 4

    as long as you paid the termination fee, you can reconnect att's service in the future if you want a different phone.
Back
Top