Search results

in lot of hunting states, it's illegal to leave it out to rot in the field. I don't know if it's part of "Wanton Waste Law". if it's not illegal to leave it out in the field, they probably are required to collect all the heads as proof in order to get paid.

perhaps you should go back and look at the final ruling by Supreme Court :cool2:

huh? I'm sorry I don't understand. changed over the years? nothing changed. it remains the same. you are confused. Chicago's gun ban law = unconstitutional and overturned - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago DC's gun restriction law = unconstitutional and overturned -...

since they tightened the rules... people sacrificed their rights, liberty, and massive tax dollars for the sake of security. you like??? I don't and I refuse to live in anywhere in NY/NYC and I refuse to pay their exorbitant income taxes.

you missed my entire point. they still have their guns because people like me and bunch of other people here fought to keep them on our hands. fish in a barrel? hunting from a helicopter? you clearly have no idea what you're talking about :lol: do you have any idea what kind of damage wild...

the last time I was in SF, I didn't like SF :lol:

it's not because it was his guns that killed a lot of people in a short period of time. it's because he was shooting fish in a barrel. it was his meticulous planning that killed a lot of people in a short period of time. in the interest of public safety, we should ban all public venues of large...

I'm going to guess that your relatives are into big game hunting. so if you know anything about hunting and gun... AR-15 (which is mostly 5.56) is a wrong rifle for hunting big game. it can't even kill a deer. in fact... it's illegal to hunt a big game with that kind of rifle in several states...

which is why you are much more likely to get killed by cops than people like Stephen Paddock

yea especially the government which I have proven to you that government have illegally bullied and killed citizens. and that includes a modern time.

and the interpretation continues to hold which is why Amendment Two is still intact. God bless America. :cool2:

that's your interpretation. the founding fathers had a completely different interpretation.

basically.... all law-abiding citizens are criminals.

we already have the version of Kent State. what do you think why President GWB signed Disaster Recovery Personal Protection Act of 2006? and there were report of some citizens being killed/shot by government gangsters. The Danziger Bridge shooting...

so when tempers flare in tense situation... government cannot be trusted. that's why we citizens are armed to keep them in check.

the problem is your complacency and debbie downer. George Washington was counting on citizens to be self-reliant, self-independent. together as a community of self-reliant, self-independent... they will not be controlled nor conquered. you, sir, have failed him.

no idea why people love California. it's ridden with debt, earthquake, fires, water shortage, drought, riots, etc. :dunno:

I'll tell you why we have Second Amendment. because of this - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt4720702/ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087985/ and this - (can you figure out what is this historical event? hint - this happened in Ohio)

What did you eat?