Search results

I thought I told you already? I'm perfectly fine with any proposed gun control laws that focus on criminals, not law-abiding citizens. got any?

a food for thought - "If our government cannot perform simple tasks like filling our criminal record forms and entering information into databases, then why in the world would we burden federal employees with new gun laws that do nothing but restrict the constitutional rights of citizens and...

that's what a shotgun is for :lol:

I learned from someone who was in military that this is how they handle it for dishonorable discharge. this is his exact quote - so beating a son, nearly cracking his skull opened and beating his wife and being in brig for a year are not extreme enough? oh boy.... oh boy.....

no it's not spotty. it's pretty solid. when a system is solid and a criminal was able to obtain it... it's usually because of human error. so far - what I'm seeing is that Air Force failed to input his criminal conviction into system and Texas denied his license to carry because he did not...

NOW we're getting a little bit more information. Air Force failed to enter the domestic violence conviction into federal database. However... Texas denied his permit to carry a gun in Texas... so we need to find out what's the reason for rejecting his permit.

again.... we need to wait and let them investigate. did he buy gun with stolen identity? did gun store seller break the law? we don't know.

just saw this in FB. (top middle is the church shooter) - Devin Patrick Kelley

we usually can. a disturbed murderer like him leaves a lot of clues and trails all over. just a matter of time till investigators piece them together. so far - we know he was dishonorably discharged... had a history of violence... had a criminal history... those are red flags for background...

god bless law-abiding armed hero who stopped him. so far... several mass shooting incidents were caused by veterans plus fired police officer. what's going on?

so are you saying that most of criminals get guns from law-abiding citizens?

thank you very much! now that's a very specific, accurate statement. your statement "90% favors gun control law" was pretty vague and misleading. now I'm glad we got it all cleared up. A background check for all gun sales is fine with me because it does not affect nor causes hardship to any...

but this was a very reckless one and cops were killed by guns they sold to cartels. the worst part? the government tried to cover it up and use this as a rallying cry for more gun control laws.

I just looked back - http://www.alldeaf.com/threads/gun-control.129878/page-10#post-2520355 you responded to foxrac's post and claimed that 90% wants gun control. I disliked this new AD design. It's very hard for me to follow a thread and keep track of discussion.

so basically... no source at all

i'm all for gun control law as long as it makes sense and it focuses on criminals instead of law-abiding citizens. maybe this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal

a perfect kill zone is a busy day anywhere in NYC. there are hundreds of people walking on street. just plow them down like this

:dunno: they're criminals. criminals can find anything from anywhere. same for drug, prostitution, fraud, etc. that's why it makes no sense to create more and more laws that penalize law-abiding citizens. when are we ever gonna focus on criminals instead of law-abiding citizens? you know what...

you posted with a link and made a claim that 90% wanted gun control. I have found nothing in your source. I can only surmise that you have pulled it out of your ass.

I can't find the part about 90% of Americans wanting gun control. can you copy-paste the exact wording?