Well, in that case, they didn't beat UGA in the bowl earlier this year.Buckdodgers said:Cause i been there!!! I watch a lot of WVA football games vs PITT! And most of the time mountaineers win!
Who cares about the UGA loss it wasnt a national championship game.Its beating the Pitt Panthers is what counts theyre UVA arch rivals.Brian said:Well, in that case, they didn't beat UGA in the bowl earlier this year.
Anyway, Pittsburgh has been known to have more bridges than anywhere else. But, this could be outdated, and Seattle should win the title.
EDITED: Okay, according to the title, it looks like sequoias is correct on Seattle, alone (city limits) having the most bridges than anywhere. This does not include Kings County.
Oops, thanks sequioas for bringing this to my attention. My mind must have wandered away.sequoias said:The title says most bridges in the world...which means the whole world. I believe there's some city in the world has more bridges than anywhere. Seattle may have a lot of bridges, but not the most in the world. Maybe the poster forgot to put most bridges in the United States.
Yeah, Buckdodgers, I won't argue about that.Buckdodgers said:Who cares about the UGA loss it wasnt a national championship game.Its beating the Pitt Panthers is what counts theyre UVA arch rivals.
wow! bridges are surely expensive to maintain. they should do it old-fashioned way!
![]()
no any futher details about this one?