Gallaudet's Fernandes wants all state deaf schools closed down, protesters say

authentic

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2005
Messages
8,530
Reaction score
453
6/30/106

Gallaudet's Fernandes wants all state deaf schools closed down, protesters say (Part 1)
At Gallaudet University, the world's only university for the deaf, in Washington DC, the president-elect, Jane Fernandes, who is scheduled to take office on Jan. 1, 2007, harbors a dangerous anti-philosophy of education, which is harmful to the emotional and intellectual well being of deaf students. Protesters are continuing in their two demands that she either step down or have her appointment rescinded, and that no reprisals be administered to the protesters.


(PressMethod) - Widespread shock and dismay has spread through the American deaf community, as details about Gallaudet President-elect Jane Fernandes's philosophy of deaf education becomes known and more fully understood.

An exhaustive analysis of policy statements made by Gallaudet officials in the past several years, plus information obtained from contact with administration insiders has shown that, in the event that Fernandes is able to survive the protests against her and become the next president of Gallaudet, she will continue policies that will lead to the permanent closure of all state residential schools for the deaf.



How Jordan and Fernandes hijacked the worldwide Deaf Culture Movement

In March of 1988, Irving King Jordan, Jr. was the dean of the College of Arts and Sciences at Gallaudet University. The Gallaudet Board of Trustees had chosen him to be a token representative of the deaf community in the group of three finalists, as the pool of applicants for the position of the seventh president of Gallaudet University was narrowed down.

When, as pre-planned, the nondeaf finalist, Elizabeth Zinser was announced as the Board's choice to be the next president of Gallaudet University, Jordan, by his own admission, went along with the administration's "party line" (a term he used) and he did not participate in nor lend his support to the Deaf President Now protest movement (the "DPN"). In fact, Jordan stood up at an assembly and actually endorsed Dr. Zinser's selection.

Immediately after that endorsement, Jordan began to discover that he had chosen to be on the wrong side of history. As he explained to the Washington Post at the time: "I talked to more than 50 people, and when I realized that I had misread the extent of the students' determination and the support base for their action, I came out for them...It became apparent that the focus was no longer on the students at Gallaudet--but that it was a national and international concern."

What is striking about the above confession is that Jordan seems not to have inquired about the substantive nature of the Deaf President Now protest movement, but was simply, in effect, wetting his finger and holding it up to see which way the political winds were blowing.

His quick and unexpected appointment to the presidency of Gallaudet took attention away from the nature of his prior beliefs. In the excitement created in finally having a deaf person chosen to be president of Gallaudet, no one seemed to want to dwell too much on the question of whether or not Jordan was actually knowledgeable enough of, or friendly enough toward, the idea of deaf culture to be able to step into the new and politically powerful role that the Deaf Culture Movement itself created.

In fact, Jordan failed to satisfy either of these criteria. Not only was he hostile to the idea of deaf culture, but he began a conscious campaign to actively fight against the continuation and growth of it and, in essence, hijack the Deaf Culture Movement in the United States, which he proceeded to convert into a political "disability rights" campaign.



The Beginning of Philosophy, Science and Modern Culture

It is somewhat appropriate to say that there exists a "Deaf Liberation Movement" in the United States, since the deaf have indeed been struggling to liberate themselves from oppressors who attempted to rob them of their humanity by forbidding them to use language in a form that is natural to them. But in order to liberate oneself, one must first concentrate on self-development.

Societies, like individuals, must first be born. They pass through various stages, including stages of adolescence, as they evolve and mature. Outstanding members of societies push their cultures to new heights and upwards to new levels of maturity. In ancient Greece, it was first Thales, and then his student Anaximander who introduced new ways of thinking about the world--systematic ways of asking questions about nature and the universe that sparked a revolution in human culture and civilization.

Other Greek thinkers pushed the new methods further, and the immensely important Western traditions of philosophy and science were born. Science suffered a setback during the long period of the Dark Ages in Europe, but then made a comeback centuries later when a "rebirth"--the "Renaissance"--took place.



Deaf people join the Greek-initiated Philosophy and Science Movement in world culture

It is also somewhat appropriate to say that the social movement surrounding the Deaf President Now campaign in America in 1988 represented a "Deaf Renaissance," since it is true that the Deaf Culture Movement suffered a setback as a result of decisions made by certain types of educators of the deaf at the conference in Milan, Italy in 1880.

Actually though, the Deaf Culture Movement was continuing to develop and grow in the United States, even though it had to be continued behind the backs of those certain types of pseudo-educators who would have it extinguished.

Laurent Clerc, himself deaf, served as an indispensable and key figure in the growth of the Deaf Culture Movement in the United States. He had been born and raised in France, and he was educated at the famous school for the deaf in Paris that had been established in the 1760s by Charles-Michel de l'Épée.
.

------------------------------------------------------------

For further information about this press release, please contact protest co-leader Brian Riley at (559) 285-5268.

For more information about Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet and Laurent Clerc, please download the book titled "Tribute to Gallaudet" on the Gallyprotest.org Web site.

For more information about Amos Kendall and the establishment of Gallaudet College (then the "Columbia Institution"), please download the book: "Autobiography of Amos Kendall" on the Gallyprotest.org Web site.


For general information on the protest against Jane Fernandes being selected President-Elect of Gallaudet, see our website:

www.gallyprotest.org

Thank you!

### ### ###





CONTACT INFORMATION

Brian Riley

Gallyprotest

Email Us

559-285-5268

http://gallyprotest.org



###





Disclaimer: If you have any questions regarding information in these press releases please contact the company listed in the press release. Please do not contact PressMethod. We will be unable to assist you with your inquiry. PressMethod disclaims any content contained in these release.



Source: http://www.pressmethod.com/releasestorage/7588.htm
 
Damn, I hate Fernandes.

I doubt that all deaf schools will shut down because it's too expensive to send all interpreters at hearing schools, or some school districts would adopt special education classes for them, that so impossible. Some deaf people, like me that cannot stand at hearing school, or even mainstream school though. I just prefer to attend deaf school because it make feel comfortable for me. Most school districts in over US would oppose to shut down the all deaf schools because they don't want hiring too many interpreters and have hard time to find interpreters too. Fernandes is nothing to know about our feeling, also she want all deaf people to get CI for no reason, that pretty stupid. I know that most deaf people don't want get CI, and some hearing families have some wise about not want to get CI too.

Thanks for gave information. :)
 
DOWN WITH STATE SCHOOLS FOR THE DEAF!

The education at state schools is lousy!

Deaf students are better off mainstreaming in public schools. They would be more prepared for the world than they would if they went to state school.

Trust me.

I used to go to a state school for the deaf. Education there is a joke. When I was in the 7th grade, the schoolwork was so easy that even my sister in 1st grade could do them herself, and she is hearing.
 
I prefer to have Deaf schools but also need to work on improving Deaf education and things like that and if what Fernades is saying and doing is true then I would not approve of it because I went to Deaf school too and really enjoyed my time there, met and made new friends and learned alots of interesting things. :) :thumb:
 
This is just more complaining by the partiers who are unhappy that Fernandes is going to try to make Gallaudet into a worthwhile ACADEMIC school rather than just being Deaf Party Land the way it is now.

Nothing to see here except a bunch of bums who don't want to work hard in their lives, move along...
 
this is crazy

Don't the Deaf need more culture ,also thrive in the in enviroment with other Deaf people for learing ASL and other culture things ?

kim
 
Heath said:
I prefer to have Deaf schools but also need to work on improving Deaf education and things like that and if what Fernades is saying and doing is true then I would not approve of it because I went to Deaf school too and really enjoyed my time there, met and made new friends and learned alots of interesting things. :) :thumb:

You got good post then that great.
 
LuciaDistrubed, yeah but that's b/c of many different reasons. Deaf schools tend to be bad in the way that an inner city high school is bad. I think that deaf schools should remain if only to provide early intervention.....and maybe enough education to build a solid base, so kids can be mainstreamed, in later grades. Many of the kids who go to deaf schools, are there b/c they've fallend though the cracks, and haven't been properly served. Trust me, I was totally mainstreamed, and got crap services and a crap education b/c of the attitude in the sped dept.
There's little to no info about what she's going to do to close down schools for the deaf......Besides she doesn't have control over schools for the deaf. Only state legislators do!
 
Teresh said:
This is just more complaining by the partiers who are unhappy that Fernandes is going to try to make Gallaudet into a worthwhile ACADEMIC school rather than just being Deaf Party Land the way it is now.

Nothing to see here except a bunch of bums who don't want to work hard in their lives, move along...

That's right.
 
Yeah, I thought that is kind of a rumor by Gallaudet students so that is why I said what I said. I also am not much for parties. I prefer to work hard and study and that is where the real money is after college graduation for a job.
 
deafdyke said:
LuciaDistrubed, yeah but that's b/c of many different reasons. Deaf schools tend to be bad in the way that an inner city high school is bad. I think that deaf schools should remain if only to provide early intervention.....and maybe enough education to build a solid base, so kids can be mainstreamed, in later grades. Many of the kids who go to deaf schools, are there b/c they've fallend though the cracks, and haven't been properly served. Trust me, I was totally mainstreamed, and got crap services and a crap education b/c of the attitude in the sped dept.
There's little to no info about what she's going to do to close down schools for the deaf......Besides she doesn't have control over schools for the deaf. Only state legislators do!

I am aware of that.

You are right, inner city public schools can be bad, but at least they provide schoolwork that are more on par with your age/grade and not letting you have the easy way out. I've noticed that at the state school for the deaf, everything was just too easy for me. I didn't learn much. But when I went to public schools, they are much more challenging for me which was what I needed. I learned a lot more. I have even gone to a couple of inner city public school and still benefited a lot more from those schools than I ever did at the state school for the deaf.

I do agree on going to a state school for early intervention and to build a solid education base, for a year or so, then going mainstream. But to keep going to the state school for the deaf all the way from kindergarten to 12th grade...no way.

I want everyone to know that I am not anti-deaf culture. I am totally fine with deaf culture. But that is not what the state school for the deaf is for. State school for the deaf is for EDUCATION, not to be with your deaf friends and have fun and whatever. People need to understand that.
 
LuciaDisturbed said:
I am aware of that.

You are right, inner city public schools can be bad, but at least they provide schoolwork that are more on par with your age/grade and not letting you
have the easy way out. I've noticed that at the state school for the deaf, everything was just too easy for me. I didn't learn much. But when I went to public schools, they are much more challenging for me which was what I needed. I learned a lot more. I have even gone to a couple of inner city public school and still benefited a lot more from those schools than I ever did at the state school for the deaf.

I do agree on going to a state school for early intervention and to build a solid education base, for a year or so, then going mainstream. But to keep going to the state school for the deaf from kindergarten to 12th grade...no way.

I want everyone to know that I am not anti-deaf culture. I am totally fine with deaf culture. But that is not what the state school for the deaf is for. State school for the deaf is for EDUCATION, not to be with your deaf friends and have fun and whatever. People need to understand that.

Well, I'm student at inner suburb school but our school is part of inner suburb with mixed of low to middle class region, also our school was went down in around 1970's since increasing more latino students, rising violation, such as fighting, stealing or something, also tardies are too high and too overcrowded. It have going improving some in late 90's, also this year is little better as little improving than in late 90's. I just got used to attend school in inner suburb and inner city school, it wasn't bad for me but it can be bad for some other students.

Some inner suburb schools are bad too, also it seems almost same as inner city schools.
 
When I look at the press release I am like huh? is this person who wrote the press release misleading us?

this press release is from Gallyprotest.org who wants to see her out of office any way they can.

(Disclaimer: I have no affiliation with gallyprotest.org or gallaudet or Fernandes at all Thank you. )

:io: ciao
 
Well, I don't completely agree in taking down deaf schools. Actually, my biggest concern is that a lot of deaf students lack a good system in their language skills. I really do think many deaf schools need a lot of improvements. I went for a couple of years to a classroom for hearing impaired children (HOH or deaf) during elementary school in a regular school setting that had a classroom specifically for these children, but they still were mainstreamed in classes they did okay by themselves. I really believe these years helped me prepare so much for mainstreaming, which I was mainstreamed in many classes while having the support. The only thing I lacked in high school with an interpreter were my social skills. At one point, I wanted to join the deaf school just for the social part, but I knew that my academics were too much to be in a school for the deaf to be considered...which is why I think they need to improve in their teachings because I can see that they need to bring high expectations for the deaf students. It's not fair that many deaf students graduate unable to read and write at their levels. It's unfair to make them pay for classes just to improve and get into any education they want. Perhaps they should use the deaf schools as a way to prepare deaf students for the mainstream instead of all of their lives?
 
Teresh said:
This is just more complaining by the partiers who are unhappy that Fernandes is going to try to make Gallaudet into a worthwhile ACADEMIC school rather than just being Deaf Party Land the way it is now.

Nothing to see here except a bunch of bums who don't want to work hard in their lives, move along...

No offense, Fernandes wouldn't going be successful president as well.

Most students at USC, UCLA, CSUN and more other college are just party at night and doing busy during school hours, such as certain hours depends on schedule classes. That's not just only for Gallaudet but it happen in every college in USA.
 
LuciaDisturbed said:
DOWN WITH STATE SCHOOLS FOR THE DEAF!

The education at state schools is lousy!

Deaf students are better off mainstreaming in public schools. They would be more prepared for the world than they would if they went to state school.

Trust me.

I used to go to a state school for the deaf. Education there is a joke. When I was in the 7th grade, the schoolwork was so easy that even my sister in 1st grade could do them herself, and she is hearing.

Not all deaf school are bad, just depends on school.
 
True, there are horrible Deaf schools and then there are GOOD Deaf schools. Maybe funding the Deaf schools better would improve them.....attract well trained teachers, improve curriculm.....seperate the most severely handicapped and mr kids to different classes, so that the kids aren't all lumped together etc etc.
 
volcomskatz said:
No offense, Fernandes wouldn't going be successful president as well.

We'll just have to wait and see. I imagine that over the next few years most of the people who are releasing the anti-Fernandes propoganda (and protested her election in the first place) will disappear from the academic ranks at Gallaudet. The reason is not that they protested her (or in the case of this article, outright lied about her) but rather that they are academicallly inept and can't live up to the standards she will institute for the Gallaudet student body.

volcomskatz said:
Most students at USC, UCLA, CSUN and more other college are just party at night and doing busy during school hours, such as certain hours depends on schedule classes. That's not just only for Gallaudet but it happen in every college in USA.

Yes, there are many liberal arts colleges and many party schools, but Gallaudet is particularly bad as a party school. A degree from CSUN is worth something. A degree from RIT is enough to get you hired by almost everyone if RIT has a strong program in your field. A degree from Gallaudet is worth about as much as the paper it's printed on because the school has a terrible academic record and is considered a party school by hiring managers.

Does CSUN have its partiers? Sure. Does RIT? Definately. But they're not the majority of the students and it doesn't prevent the majority of the students from being academically successful.
 
Teresh said:
Yes, there are many liberal arts colleges and many party schools, but Gallaudet is particularly bad as a party school. A degree from CSUN is worth something. A degree from RIT is enough to get you hired by almost everyone if RIT has a strong program in your field. A degree from Gallaudet is worth about as much as the paper it's printed on because the school has a terrible academic record and is considered a party school by hiring managers.

That is true.
 
Please read parts 1 to 6 of the press release

Teresh said:
reason is not that they protested her (or in the case of this article, outright lied about her)


Hi Teresh,

Please keep in mind that you only looked at Part 1 of the press release. I didn't lie. This is an analysis that presents conclusions. I never said that Fernandes gave a quote or something that she wanted to close schools down. Of course she would never do that.

Please read the whole thing on the Gallyprotest blog:

www.gallyprotest.org/blog

Thanks,

Brian
 
Back
Top