Inappropriate Signatures

Oceanbreeze said:
You know what I find amazing? You say this; yet you bashed me for my opinion regarding the avatars. My gripe with GA's avatar wasn't even voiced publicly. I took it private like everyone is always encouraging us to do when we have a problem with another member, rather than hashing it out here in open forum.; yet I get attacked for doing so, and also, agreeing with Eve here in public?

This was her thread, btw. I didn't create it. If you want to be mad at someone. Be mad at her.

I guess this is one of those no-win sitiuations. :dizzy:

:confused: She did not bashed you, I did. :doh:
 
^Angel^ said:
Here's other thread I created too about dirty smiley!

http://alldeaf.com/showthread.php?t=12874&page=2&pp=20 ....


I know I know I'm such a whiner! :giggle:

:aw: you and whiner? NOooooo! I find okay you created a thread to ask us for our feedback/opinion like what Eve did here.

:shock: I didn´t know that you created a thread to ask for our feedback and opinion... Honestly, it doesn´t bother me really... It´s up to Alex...
 
Oceanbreeze said:
You know what I find amazing? You say this; yet you bashed me for my opinion regarding the avatars.


:confused: Where did I bashed you at, show me proof.....
 
Cheri said:
No, It just seems like you always so bossy, so controlling, Hey you don't own anyone, Why do you care what signature she has what avatar she has? You don't have to use it on your own, Why don't you mind your own business in what everyone else is doing or what they have.


You can characterize me however you wish, but I have to ask...What business is it of yours? This was a private matter between BullyMom and I until today. I don't understand why YOU are so upset that I PMed BullyMom with this issue? :confused:
 
DreamDeaf said:
However, you made the "private matter" public, and therefore, open to discussion. You can't just say it was a private matter, end of discussion and then expect it to be over right there and then. That's part of life. you open a can of worms in a matter of seconds, you spend your lifetime trying to capture the worms and close the can.

I have a right to defend myself when I'm being attacked. If that opens a can of worms, so be it.
 
sign0145.gif
~ r u looking for war w/me ?

:sure: ~ Oh plaauuuaazzahhh, Give me a break.. r u close mind!

Look Media, other forum, Television, and much more..
Will you care banned them.. You're wrong.. no no no..
Oh please.. Give a break, if r u don't like it..
*pphhffft move yer back off* okay
*scoffs*

I ain't interest flame war w/you..
I'm getting know you more.. all you want issues more over again over again..
Enuff Enuff...

Made me boring your breath constantly whining!


sign0074.gif
 
Eve said:
It is nifty, but look how long it took YOU to find this feature....imagine how long it would take a newcomer to the forum to find such a feature. By that time, they may no longer be interested in the forum due to the inappropriate material they encounter in the process.
I have been using the "option" settings for quite a while. I enjoy the "clean" look on my AD pages now, and I can scroll thru the posts much quicker too, without all the tedious distractions.

Maybe the "invisible" avatars and sigs should be the default, and members would have to use the option button to view them?

Like some of the other members here, I don't "visit" Penisarium, Adults Only, or Hotties. From the titles of the threads I see there, the topics are not just sexual in nature but also very "junior high" silly. I guess it is the electronic age version of scribbling dirty words and pictures on public bathroom walls. The good thing about those clearly labeled forums is that people can make informed decisions to either avoid them or access them.

What I don't like is the occassional "blind side" hit I get when I open up a thread in General forum, with an innocent sounding title, only to view something nasty. I don't appreciate the "false advertising".

I also don't want to see nasty avatars and sigs when I'm reading a thread about home decorating or recipes. That's why I keep those options OFF.

Just my two centavos, and nothing personal to anyone.
 
well said, Reba..


SEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

*scoff* why can't you use common sense!!

No wonder why you have no brainless?!?!?
 
Oceanbreeze said:
I have a right to defend myself when I'm being attacked. If that opens a can of worms, so be it.


This is what you said to me in another thread, when I tried to defend myself it funni how some people don't pratice what they preach! :shaking my head:

Oceanbreeze said:
People are going to say what they want, though. It's human nature. I know you're upset at what you see, but there really isn't anything you are going to do about it. I have been upset about things before, too, but I guess I realized that I can't change others. I'm only responsible for myself.

Blow it off, Angel. It's not worth getting really upset over. Life is way too short to worry about things said on a forum. :)

Have a good day!
 
Some people don't practice what they preach, eh ? Well, let me tell you - that INCLUDE YOU, too. Some people find some flaws about ya as well. So, DON'T say " some people don't practice what they preach "... they might find some flaws in you. Tell that " practice what you preach " on yourself instead of them.

About the avatar/signature : GA, I find these inappropiorate signature you had in yours about your personal life with your hubby -- THAT is NOT necessary to be said for everyone to know. It should be kept in bedroom. And, also I find this that the way you talk is verrrrrry rude. Your rude remarks -- gee, did you teach your kids to talk like that huh ?

I will not be surprised if I knew they will be like their momma when they grows up and they will say rude remarks to other people like you did to some ADers here. :roll:
 
CyberRed said:
Some people don't practice what they preach, eh ? Well, let me tell you - that INCLUDE YOU, too. Some people find some flaws about ya as well. So, DON'T say " some people don't practice what they preach "... they might find some flaws in you. Tell that " practice what you preach " on yourself instead of them.

About the avatar/signature : GA, I find these inappropiorate signature you had in yours about your personal life with your hubby -- THAT is NOT necessary to be said for everyone to know. It should be kept in bedroom. And, also I find this that the way you talk is verrrrrry rude. Your rude remarks -- gee, did you teach your kids to talk like that huh ?

I will not be surprised if I knew they will be like their momma when they grows up and they will say rude remarks to other people like you did to some ADers here. :roll:


blah blah blah blah blah blah...
:rofl: ~ applause you..
Wha... dumb!
You're jump bangwagon again..

*ahem*
Look AD'ers who love me..
Nice try CR... *ppffffttt*
For CR...
sign0015.gif
 
Call me blind, but can someone tell me where I can find these signatures with sexual content? Avatars? Text?

I can understand members, like Eve in this case, who care enough to bring this issue up and see what we all think. I can also understand members like GalaxyAngel who find humor in things such as avatars, signatures, etc.

Personally, I have no problem with avatars like that of Steel's because it's not extreme, but at the same time I do care about the children having access to AllDeaf and seeing this kind of stuff. I mean, I have 4 tiny and gorgeous nephews and nieces, so I understand.

So, here's what I would like for all of us to do. We will set up a poll or two, and everyone will vote to either eliminate "sexual" (don't get confused with porn -- that I will definitely not allow in public) signatures/avatars/smilies, or not. This is your comunity, I'll leave this decision up to you guys. But, please, let's all stop with the finger pointing and be adults about this, ok?

Discuss! :aw:
 
Hey Eve,

Why do I feel funny that you surely sound like Ms Terry Rakolta who contacted all sponsors to cancel the commericals on "Married with Children."

Eve, are you for censorship? If not, back off.....
 
Beowulf said:
I get dibs on rigging the polls!
Oooo, I thought that was exclusively Republican territory! ;)
 
Reba said:
Oooo, I thought that was exclusively Republican territory! ;)

Just about, but why should they have all the fun?
Anyway, I wonder who will throw together a nice ANONYMOUS poll?
 
Call me blind, but can someone tell me where I can find these signatures with sexual content? Avatars? Text?
You asked…Fortunately, the culprit of the signature I had in mind has chosen to change her signature. First, she had an avatar of a cat masterbating, a few weeks ago. Then, today I had enough of her signature which stated that she “lurved” her hubby eat her *moan horny*. Then in this very topic, she posted a very explicit and graphic animated pic of a human anus opening and closing at close range. I find all of the before mentioned examples to be quite distasteful and verging on pornographic.

Eve, are you for censorship? If not, back off.....
I am for freedom of speech under the RIGHT circumstances (in the pensarium, for example). I don’t feel those of us who don’t want to know about your sex life should have to be exposed to it on a daily basis through your avatar or signature. Furthermore, I have the right to my opinion and have no intention of “backing off”.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top