(Case study, year 2008. He did get a CI eventually in right ear.)
(for hear again, his audiogram shows 95db HL at 250Hz in both ears and over 100db HL in the higher frequencies)
This just goes to show that hearing aids most certainly are not inferior, well unless you happen to have a 115db or 120db hearing loss. My audiologist doesn't recommend CIs for me or anyone hearing equal or better than me, but did say that no HA will ever aid a 120db loss or if there's no residual hearing left, such as with cochlear dead zones.
He didn't mention what HA he was wearing but it's possible he wore the Phonak Naida V UP HAs(and if not, an equivalent from a different brand). I wear those too and got them in 2008. Right now I am able to understand 70% to 80% of what my dad says in the car and that's with much worse aided scores than what ive shown in the chart below(im getting my HAs reprogrammed for max gains and to enable transposition) so it's not too much of a stretch that he could score 90% in noise(and I might be able to match his scores). He did say it took alot of training, but nothing wrong with that and besides a CI would still require alot of training!
His hearing loss is progressive but he held off getting a CI for a very long time, instead doing the right thing by trying all the best HAs and maxing the gains. He did mention that he was taking a big risk getting a CI, but figured that he always has the better left ear and also even if CI was worse than HA, in a few years itll become better than HA because his HL was progressive and HAs won't benefit him after a few years. He probably felt that today's CI technology was "good enough" to risk the worse ear and hope he gets lucky with the CI results.
Well he did get lucky but how much can you improve when you are already hearing great with the best HAs with max gains? His speech recognition improved a few percent and is now over 95% while it was over 90% with both HAs together. He did get the biggest improvement with CNC but CNC doesn't usually reflect real world converstations, HINT would most closely reflect this which he was already over 90% to begin with.
There is way too much hype with CI recently. It is being pushed as the "latest and greatest" by audiologists, ENT and surgeons. They are probably forcing insurance companies to pay at least 80% of the $50,000 tag that CI carries. I really wish insurance companies would pay for HAs and for audiologists to work with the person to program the HA so he or she hears the best. The man who got the CI even mentioned in his case study that everyone should be training themselves to understand speech with HAs first and that it's no different from CI, both are simply tools to give the deaf access to sounds and speech.
Then this begs the question, why take the risk with CI and it's associated surgery? As long as you are getting benefits from HAs, stick with them! Even the profoundly deaf can benefit just fine with today's HA technology. It's simply a matter of choosing the right HA, having a skilled audiologist program and reprogram your HAs and getting speech reception training. This is possible even with unaided hearing as bad as mine and his. Of course if your unaided hearing is something like 115db or 120db at 1000Hz and NR above that and still 90db or worse in the low frequencies, it's going to be very difficult if not impossible to be able to score better than 40% speech reception which is the cutoff for CI candidacy.
I will repeat that I am not against CI, but only advise that you be realistic about what CI can do and can't do. It's not a cure or a miracle, but just another tool to aid the deaf in sounds and speech. Over 90% of the profoundly deaf still have some residual hearing left that would be amplified with HAs and thus provide access to sounds and in most cases, also speech. There's always other options such as lip reading, ASL and writing for anyone that ever has any difficulty understanding others.
I'm jealous, I'm so impressed-- in fact I never known someone who had scored over 90 percent on speech recognition with their hearing aids not in my knowledge. WOW!! 
Charlotte. Some people in this thread seem to be forgetting that.