As more toddlers get cochlear implants, they face a strange new world

Miss-Delectable

New Member
Joined
Apr 18, 2004
Messages
17,164
Reaction score
5
As more toddlers get cochlear implants, they face a strange new world - The Denver Post

Fat tears are rolling down Eva Riggs' tiny face, and even with a pacifier stuck between her pink lips, she's sobbing hysterically.

The 1-year-old's parents, though, are choked up with happiness — beaming smiles and wet eyes.

In this moment, which has shattered little Eva to pieces, she heard her parents' voices for the first time in her life. She heard her 4-year-old brother say, "It's OK," and the chime of a xylophone sitting on the floor at Children's Hospital in Aurora.

Eva was born deaf. After 14 silent months, audiologist Jennifer Kolb switched on the toddler's cochlear implants, sending noise through electrodes surgically implanted in her inner ears.

A growing number of deaf babies are receiving cochlear implants soon after their first birthday — the Food and Drug Administration has approved the surgery for children as young as 12 months. For parents, that second the sound clicks on is overwhelming, nearly indescribable.

And for kids, especially those who receive implants about the same time hearing children typically learn to talk, it's usually terrifying but offers the chance to grow up with normal speech, even the potential to play the piano.

"To be able to give a child a gift of hearing and be able to open up a whole new world for them, it's very gratifying," said Dr. Patricia Yoon, Eva's surgeon. "You see them turn toward the sound for the first time ever. It's a pretty incredible thing to witness."

Traumatic start

On the October day Eva's implants were activated, Kolb gave her parents a five-second countdown. Everyone stared at the content, easy-going child with bright blue eyes, a whisper of blond hair and an angelic face — hoping she would laugh when noise tickled her ears.

But her face turned to a scowl, even though the first sounds flooding in were low volume. Soon Eva was burying her head in her mother's shoulder, clinging in fear, as her parents — Meghan and Justin Riggs — signed with their hands and told her, "This is good. You're OK." Eva calmed for a second, sniffling, but lost it again with one look at the audiologist — somehow she knew Kolb was responsible for this.

"Her crying is more reassuring to me than anything, really, to know it's working," Meghan Riggs said. After a while, Justin handed his daughter a cracker and walked her out of the room, hoping a change of scenery would quiet her.

They wondered how long it would take for the clearly traumatized little girl, now making the hiccuping gasps that come after a hard cry, to adjust. Eva, in her jean skirt and black leggings, clutched her polka-dotted blanket even tighter when the ear pieces got anywhere near her.

Ignoring the signs

Eva didn't pass the newborn hearing test on the day she was born, Aug. 19, 2008. But her parents weren't worried — lots of infants don't pass because they have fluid in their ears.

Meghan and Justin tried to ignore other signs. They told themselves their daughter was a hard sleeper; that's why she had never been awakened from a nap by a loud noise. They figured she was easily distracted by toys; that's why she didn't turn toward them when they called her name.

"If she was facing away from us, we could be screaming at the top of our lungs and there would be no response," Meghan said. "But we didn't want to see her as anything less than perfect."

The Riggses grabbed onto what they thought was proof she could hear. There was the time Eva, sleeping in her car seat on the living room floor, startled when someone sneezed. They know now it was the vibration of their pastor's foot stomping as he sneezed, not the noise at all.

When she was 9 months old, Eva was sedated at Children's Hospital so doctors could monitor her brain while sending sound waves into her ears through headphones. Her brain didn't react, meaning she was deaf.

Meghan, though, was prepared for good news, confident the audiologist would tell them they had removed fluid from Eva's ears and she could hear.

"I remember being in the gift shop looking at noisemaker toys," Meghan said. "When she told us that Eva had profound hearing loss, it really hit me like a ton of bricks because I didn't prepare myself for that."

Weeks later, the Riggses left their home, church and Justin's job as an electrician in Rapid City, S.D., to move to Denver, near the hospital's internationally known Bill Daniels Center for Children's Hearing. Now they live in a modest apartment a few miles from the hospital. Justin is struggling to find work.

"We took it for what it was, and we grew together as a family," Meghan said. "God wouldn't give us this if he didn't think we could handle it."

Another test determined Eva's auditory nerve worked, making her a candidate for cochlear implants. Eva's hair cells — thousands of tiny hearing receptors that normally would vibrate in her cochlea, in the inner ear — are damaged or absent.

Surgeon Yoon placed Eva's cochlear implants during an eight-hour surgery Sept. 21. Magnets were embedded under Eva's skin behind each ear, allowing 3-inch, oval devices with microphones and sound processors to stick to her head.

When Eva grows more hair, it will hide the devices wrapping around her ears.

Sound is picked up through the microphones, turned into electrical signals and sent through her scalp to the internal device. Inside, 22 electrodes — substitutes for the damaged hair cells — carry the signals to the auditory nerve, which takes them to the brain.

It's likely to take months for Eva to distinguish between her mom and dad's voices, to hear a slam and know it was the door, to associate a bark with a dog. Newborns have months to absorb such information, long before they talk.

People with cochlear implants, which were approved for 1-year-olds in 2002, do not hear the same broad range of frequency as a hearing person. The sounds Eva heard during the first few days after the Oct. 13 activation of her implants were metallic buzzing and beeps. Every few days, her audiologist ramped up the frequency.

"Calling her name or shaking a rattle, it sounds the same at first," said audiologist Kolb. "She's going to need to hear Dad talking and see him, so she can sort of map her brain."

Some kids laugh or stare, bewildered, when Kolb turns on sound for the first time. Most cry.

"We have no way of telling them this is coming," she said. "It's going from nothing to everything in a few seconds."

Children's Hospital surgeons will place 28 cochlear implants this year, twice as many as last year.

Cochlear implants are controversial in the deaf community. Not all parents of deaf children want their child to have implants, but "it's turning into the option of choice for a lot of families," Kolb said.

The hospital has a team that includes family consultant Stephanie Olson, who is deaf and got a cochlear implant about three years ago, to help parents decide.

Having a deaf consultant, whose hearing device is hidden under her brown hair, gives parents a powerful sense of calm.

"It's reassuring for families — the hopes and dreams are still there; they didn't lose them," Olson said. "Their child can still do what they hoped for."

Implant surgery, which costs about $35,000 just for the equipment, typically is covered by insurance.

The technology is far more advanced than a hearing aid, which only can amplify the sound a person already hears.

"If you view deafness as an ailment . . . then it is curing deafness," surgeon Yoon said.

Guy and Tenley Williams are proof.

Both of the Williams children received implants at Children's.

Their parents, Lindsay and Steve Williams of Columbus, Mont., had hoped Guy, now 6, who got one implant at 13 months and the second at age 3, would catch up to his peers by fourth grade. But in kindergarten this year, "he's right at the top of his class," said his mom. "It's beyond amazing to us."

Guy's speech is nearly perfect; he just doesn't pronounce M's and T's crisply. And in a crowded room, his parents sometimes have to tap him to get his attention.

Little sister Tenley, 17 months, whose implants were activated in July, already says three words: baby, kitty and hello.

Steve Williams was born deaf and communicates through lip-reading, sign language and text messages. At 31, he is now considering getting cochlear implants.

"He is happy that he has been successful in his time, but it was hard to overcome," his wife said. "Any way we can make our children's lives easier, he's happy to do so."

Successful experiments

Two weeks after Eva's "hearing birthday," the Riggses tried an experiment.

Four-year-old Myles hid behind his parents' bed and kept calling her name. Eva was sitting on the floor down the hall, in the living room. Slowly, pausing occasionally to listen, she crawled all the way to her brother.

Another day, Meghan was feeding Eva a bite of "shipwreck" casserole, pretending the spoon was an airplane and inflecting her voice up and down. Eva copied the inflection, "Ah-ah-ah." Another first.

"She used to be very silent," Justin Riggs said. "There was no reason to make a sound. I could have sworn she was copying the sound of a rooster the other day."

Eva wears her implant devices nearly all the time now, except when she's sleeping. It took her only a few days to take them without tears. Now, when she wakes up from a nap, she taps her ears, asking her parents to turn on some sound.

Other 14-month-olds learned to babble at 6 months and by now are saying their first words. The Riggses expect Eva will catch up within six months or so.

For now, it's small things that are huge to them — how she turns her head to look when someone laughs, claps her hands when her dad plays his guitar, makes a grumpy, annoyed noise when her brother messes with the drum she is banging.

Throughout all the appointments, the surgery, the "hearing birthday" that terrified her, the Riggses hoped they were making the right decision. Eva told them, in her own way, they are.

Last Thursday, after one of her new "ears" had fallen off while she was playing, Eva tried to stick it to her baby doll's head.

Tears instantly filled Meghan's eyes.

"It brings me joy to know that it's something that she understands," she said. "She wants to take care of her baby in the same way that she is being taken care of."
 
Isn't that wonderful? The ability to hear is such a precious gift not to be taken for granted.
 
"If you view deafness as an ailment . . . then it is curing deafness," surgeon Yoon said.

The Deaf community was right...people told us we were wrong that doctors have claimed that CIs were a cure for deafness. Well, here is proof.
 
"If you view deafness as an ailment . . . then it is curing deafness," surgeon Yoon said.

The Deaf community was right...people told us we were wrong that doctors have claimed that CIs were a cure for deafness. Well, here is proof.

Doctors are seriously deluded. They do not cure deafness, you would think they would know since they work in that field, :shock::roll:
 
Doctors are seriously deluded. They do not cure deafness, you would think they would know since they work in that field, :shock::roll:

Many doctors are delusional about deafness and that has been going on for decades. It was a doctor who told my mom that by not exposing me to ASL, I would be normal. Can you believe that? Sick, isnt it?

Many parents have told the Deaf community that we are making that up when we say that doctors have said CIs were a cure but now, look who's talking. I dont care if drs say that or not but putting the blame on the Deaf community for what drs say needs to stop.
 
Many doctors are delusional about deafness and that has been going on for decades. It was a doctor who told my mom that by not exposing me to ASL, I would be normal. Can you believe that? Sick, isnt it?

Many parents have told the Deaf community that we are making that up when we say that doctors have said CIs were a cure but now, look who's talking. I dont care if drs say that or not but putting the blame on the Deaf community for what drs say needs to stop.

:roll:

ASL doesnt make you abnormal, it's a LANGUAGE, just like french, spanish etc.
That is sick, and so unbelievable.
I know a lot of parents believe their child is "hearing" and is a "normal" child with CI's, it just gives you the ability to hear if you wear it!!

It defo needs to stop!! :mad:
 
No cure for deafness. With a tool you can hear with not natural sounds, still no cure. if anything goes wrong with CIs,then you are simply natural Deaf.
 
No cure for deafness. With a tool you can hear with not natural sounds, still no cure. if anything goes wrong with CIs,then you are simply natural Deaf.

True!! It's just stupid....
we are and ALWAYS will be deaf, no matter what
 
I agree,

CI is not a cure. In fact, if it was, many CI babies would naturally learn to speak as well as hearing babies and NEVER have to have speech therapy I'm thinking about how many hearing children who doesn't take speech therapy compare to children with CI. I am aware of hearing people with speech therapy, but it isn't because of their hearing.
 
I agree,

CI is not a cure. In fact, if it was, many CI babies would naturally learn to speak as well as hearing babies and NEVER have to have speech therapy I'm thinking about how many hearing children who doesn't take speech therapy compare to children with CI. I am aware of hearing people with speech therapy, but it isn't because of their hearing.

It has happened. There are children given CI's that don't ever have to go to formal therapy. Research shows that if the CI is given before 12 months old, the child can develop speech at the same rate as a hearing child.
 
It has happened. There are children given CI's that don't ever have to go to formal therapy. Research shows that if the CI is given before 12 months old, the child can develop speech at the same rate as a hearing child.

Said the hearing woman who had never experienced it.
 
It has happened. There are children given CI's that don't ever have to go to formal therapy. Research shows that if the CI is given before 12 months old, the child can develop speech at the same rate as a hearing child.

They would have had to go to some therapy sessions seeing they need to learn to hear with their CI and would include learning to speak etc
 
They would have had to go to some therapy sessions seeing they need to learn to hear with their CI and would include learning to speak etc

Not always. I have a close friend who has 2 children with CI's and neither of them have had formal therapy. She works with them at home, but they do not have therapy.

They were both age appropriate by 3 years old.
 
Not always. I have a close friend who has 2 children with CI's and neither of them have had formal therapy. She works with them at home, but they do not have therapy.

They were both age appropriate by 3 years old.

When they get to school, they are more likely get recommended speech therapy by a teacher. We'll see
 
It has happened. There are children given CI's that don't ever have to go to formal therapy. Research shows that if the CI is given before 12 months old, the child can develop speech at the same rate as a hearing child.

But it's not a cure by any means. CI doesn't provide normal hearing altho it may help them function and interact with hearing people better.
 
It has happened. There are children given CI's that don't ever have to go to formal therapy. Research shows that if the CI is given before 12 months old, the child can develop speech at the same rate as a hearing child.
Then what's the point of AVT then?
 
Then what's the point of AVT then?

I think she is referring to babies with implant. She thinks most of them who had CI as infant won't need AVT when they get older. That CI would be as natural as hearing.

But I think if they didn't have therapy before school, they are more likely need it when they start going to school.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by shel90 View Post
Then what's the point of AVT then?
I think she is referring to babies with implant. She thinks most of them who had CI as infant won't need AVT when they get older. That CI would be as natural as hearing.

But I think if they didn't have therapy before school, they are more likely need it when they start going to school.

Agreed!!
 
faire_jour...............On the other hand, while there are some kids who need minimal therapy, most kids still need intensive speech therapy. Even with AG Bad kids, they still have language therapies and significent delays.
 
faire_jour...............On the other hand, while there are some kids who need minimal therapy, most kids still need intensive speech therapy. Even with AG Bad kids, they still have language therapies and significent delays.
Actually, if you read the latest research it says that kids implanted before 12 months don't have language delays. They stay typical with hearing kids.
 
Back
Top