Cop Rookie shot a naked black man

M

Mookie

Guest
Police Killing of Naked, Unarmed Man Detailed
Arundel Rookie Says Suspect Was Erratic


By Eric Rich
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, February 4, 2006; B03

PH2005122100656.jpg
Deborah Bell, left, with her son's girlfriend, Chelsia Wallace, and their son, Kyron Coates, in Bell's north Baltimore home. Donald Coates was shot to death by an Anne Arundel County police officer. (By Mark Gail -- The Washington Post)

The suspect was naked and seemed to be running aimlessly. That was what rookie Officer Tommy Pleasant said he noticed first as he turned onto a road in Anne Arundel County just before dusk in May.

As Pleasant later described it to a detective, he knew he'd found the man police were searching for that evening, a suspect who a short time earlier had fired a handgun inside a home a few blocks away. Pleasant said that as he stepped from his cruiser, he began to draw his weapon even before both feet were on the ground.

The naked man turned. His eyes "appeared to be as big as golf balls," Pleasant said, "like he was looking through my eyes and beyond me."

Pleasant's statement, along with other documents from the investigation of the fatal shooting that followed, was released in response to a public records request from The Washington Post. The records add fresh detail to the May 24 encounter that ended in the death of Donald Coates during what police have characterized as "close-quarters contact."

Coates, who was 20 and unarmed, was shot in the face, the chest, the back of the neck and the back of his left forearm. One of those shots, or a fifth bullet, grazed his chest, a medical examiner found. The medical examiner found no powder burns on Coates's body and concluded in an autopsy report that "there was no evidence of close-range discharge of a firearm surrounding any of the gunshot wounds."

According to Thomas Mauriello, a criminologist at the University of Maryland who is not involved in the case, that finding suggests that Pleasant's weapon was at least three or four feet from Coates when the shots were fired.

A grand jury decided in September that Pleasant, now 23, is not criminally responsible for Coates's death. James Rhodes, a Baltimore lawyer, said he expects to file a lawsuit over the shooting in federal court on behalf of Coates's family.

Coates's mother, Deborah Bell of Baltimore, faulted Pleasant for drawing his weapon so quickly. Even if he had felt her son was lunging toward him, she said yesterday, "it still wasn't right for him to shoot him the way he shot him, not that many times."

About a month before the encounter in Glen Burnie, according to the records, a sergeant in the Anne Arundel police department distributed a bulletin with the headline "Naked Suspects: No Laughing Matter." The bulletin, produced by researchers at Minnesota State University, warns that confrontations with naked suspects pose unrecognized risks and that deadly force "may end up being necessary."

Pleasant's attorney, Michael Davey, has not returned calls seeking comment in recent days. But according to the records released to The Post, he drew the bulletin to the attention of investigators early on. The bulletin describes an incident from two decades ago in which a naked man in another state disarmed and killed a police officer. "Some of the most dangerous people cops run into are naked offenders," says the bulletin, by the Force Science Research Center.

In his statement, Pleasant said he had read the bulletin. He did not specifically say whether it influenced his thinking during the encounter with Coates.

According to the statement, which he gave at police headquarters in June, Pleasant told Detective Richard Alban that he could see Coates's hands and that he realized Coates was unarmed. He told Alban that he suspected Coates was under the influence of drugs and that he believed he had no option but to shoot when Coates ran toward him "at a full head of steam."

"The nude black male showed no emotion, no expression, and there was no movement in his face at all," Pleasant told Alban.

Pleasant said he retreated toward the back of his patrol car as Coates approached. Pleasant said he had both hands on his gun -- leaving him, he said, unable to use any nonlethal measure to subdue Coates.

"As the nude black male reached for my head and gun area, his hands were all in my face, I was in fear for my life and fired my service weapon," Pleasant said.

"Nothing changed," he said. "The nude black male didn't say oww, his expression didn't change."

Still fearing for his life, Pleasant said, he fired again, "at which time the nude black male dropped straight to the ground."

Earlier that evening, Coates, who witnesses said had been using marijuana, dialed 911 from a home on Allen Road, where he sometimes stayed with his girlfriend and their newborn.

Coates, then apparently delusional, can be heard on the tape firing a gun after telling the dispatcher that people are after him and in the house. "Can you please hurry up, man, somebody's trying to kill me," Coates says.

© 2006 The Washington Post Company
 
I back the police 100%.

First of all why was that black boy smoking dope?

Second of all , people don't run into the night naked!!!

Third of all, The police officer relied on his training to save his own life and the suspect is dead all because he fought with the police and refused to obey commands by the police.

1. Smoked dope.

2. Ran into the night naked.

3. He fought with the police.

I back the police 100%

About a month before the encounter in Glen Burnie, according to the records, a sergeant in the Anne Arundel police department distributed a bulletin with the headline "Naked Suspects: No Laughing Matter." The bulletin, produced by researchers at Minnesota State University, warns that confrontations with naked suspects pose unrecognized risks and that deadly force "may end up being necessary." "Some of the most dangerous people cops run into are naked offenders." says the bulletin.

Earlier that evening, Coates, who witnesses said had been using marijuana, dialed 911 from a home on Allen Road, where he sometimes stayed with his girlfriend and their newborn.

Coates, then apparently delusional, can be heard on the tape firing a gun after telling the dispatcher that people are after him and in the house. "Can you please hurry up, man, somebody's trying to kill me," Coates says.
 
Heath said:
I back the police 100%.

First of all why was that black boy smoking dope?

Second of all , people don't run into the night naked!!!

Third of all, The police officer relied on his training to save his own life and the suspect is dead all because he fought with the police and refused to obey commands by the police.

1. Smoked dope.

2. Ran into the night naked.

3. He fought with the police.

I back the police 100%

About a month before the encounter in Glen Burnie, according to the records, a sergeant in the Anne Arundel police department distributed a bulletin with the headline "Naked Suspects: No Laughing Matter." The bulletin, produced by researchers at Minnesota State University, warns that confrontations with naked suspects pose unrecognized risks and that deadly force "may end up being necessary." "Some of the most dangerous people cops run into are naked offenders." says the bulletin.

Earlier that evening, Coates, who witnesses said had been using marijuana, dialed 911 from a home on Allen Road, where he sometimes stayed with his girlfriend and their newborn.

Coates, then apparently delusional, can be heard on the tape firing a gun after telling the dispatcher that people are after him and in the house. "Can you please hurry up, man, somebody's trying to kill me," Coates says.

HOLD IT!!!

I find several flaws in this article.

First of all, "Researchers at Minnesota State University..." Which MSU? There are quite a number of them and who are the researchers, as I'd like to interview them myself.

Second, the cop already was ready to shoot as he got out of his patrol car. I don't know of any cops that do this.

Third, this cop was only 22-years old, I highly suspect this. Why was this officer alone and not have another officer or watch commander there? Why didn't he call for backup? No mention of that. He said he had "no time to use anything else..." but he had time to draw his gun before even leaving his patrol car. This sounds fishy to me. I'd be interested to see the full report and be able to interview each officer on this police force regarding this.
 
pek1 said:
HOLD IT!!!

I find several flaws in this article.

First of all, "Researchers at Minnesota State University..." Which MSU? There are quite a number of them and who are the researchers, as I'd like to interview them myself.

Second, the cop already was ready to shoot as he got out of his patrol car. I don't know of any cops that do this.

Third, this cop was only 22-years old, I highly suspect this. Why was this officer alone and not have another officer or watch commander there? Why didn't he call for backup? No mention of that. He said he had "no time to use anything else..." but he had time to draw his gun before even leaving his patrol car. This sounds fishy to me. I'd be interested to see the full report and be able to interview each officer on this police force regarding this.

Each situation is unique. Until then, you have not been in a police officer's boots. I have seen several instances of where the police had their guns out before they even got out of the car because the situation was that dangerous. The policeman was dealing with several un-knowns and just because someone's hands show they are un-armed does not mean they are not armed.
 
i would pass to FlyFree and Taylor, They would know the right answer with thier own options.
 
pek1 said:
HOLD IT!!!

I find several flaws in this article.

First of all, "Researchers at Minnesota State University..." Which MSU? There are quite a number of them and who are the researchers, as I'd like to interview them myself.

Second, the cop already was ready to shoot as he got out of his patrol car. I don't know of any cops that do this.

Third, this cop was only 22-years old, I highly suspect this. Why was this officer alone and not have another officer or watch commander there? Why didn't he call for backup? No mention of that. He said he had "no time to use anything else..." but he had time to draw his gun before even leaving his patrol car. This sounds fishy to me. I'd be interested to see the full report and be able to interview each officer on this police force regarding this.

I am very familiar with this case. First, when 911 was called, Coates was firing a gun within his house and those shots can be heard on the 911 tape. Second, when Coates left his house, he puts the gun in his waistband and then he attempted to carjack a married couple who were getting into their vehicle. He began attacking them and they told police he was reaching into his waistband to get the gun. At some point, however, the gun is lost and the people are able to get away. Coates then takes all of his clothes off and begins hiding behind a bush and those green electrical transformer boxes and goes running after the officer full speed.

I'm not going to second guess this officer because I was not in his shoes. I do know that he was responding to a call where somebody was actively shooting....not just a person with a gun, but somebody who was firing that weapon. Secondly, from my own experience, a man who is completely naked during broad daylight running at you full speed...there is obviously nothing wrong with this guy...I guess he's just out for a sunday stroll in the park.

Pek, to answer your questions, in Maryland, in fact all the states I'm aware of, you can be a police officer at the age of 21..so its not uncommon to have an officer that is 22 years of age. In Anne Arundel County where this incident occurred, officers ride alone but back-up is coming. There were A LOT of officers enroute to this call because it was an active shooter....this officer just happen to be the one who came across him.

Oh, and Mookie I'm curious about the reasoning you posted this story. This incident happened back in May. You made all kinds of accusations against me in another thread that has since been closed. You never did have the balls to answer a simple question, yet you demanded repeatedly that other members here answer your questions. You have also challenged me to meet you in the city and to leave my badge at home. With your posting of this article, I can only assume that you are on this anti-cop kick now.

BTW, since this thread isn't closed, why not answer that simple question?
 
It's seem something not right in this story here, why did the police shot this nude man so many times? what was he soo scare about?....The man wasn't armed, and beside it proves that the man wasn't even close by to where the police is standing at.....

I don't buy the police story at all.....I know some cops covers up the story to make them innocent....
 
pek1 said:
HOLD IT!!!

I find several flaws in this article.

First of all, "Researchers at Minnesota State University..." Which MSU? There are quite a number of them and who are the researchers, as I'd like to interview them myself.

Second, the cop already was ready to shoot as he got out of his patrol car. I don't know of any cops that do this.

Third, this cop was only 22-years old, I highly suspect this. Why was this officer alone and not have another officer or watch commander there? Why didn't he call for backup? No mention of that. He said he had "no time to use anything else..." but he had time to draw his gun before even leaving his patrol car. This sounds fishy to me. I'd be interested to see the full report and be able to interview each officer on this police force regarding this.


Yep I agree, this story sounds fishy to me too...
 
:roll: Rolls my eyes at mookie pek, yeah they are both anti-cop. I am Pro-Cop.:thumb:
 
:shock: The naked guy was unarmed, was shot in the face, the chest, the back of the neck? What's wrong with that cop? Cops sometimes make the biggest mistake that cost people their lives. Sometimes Cops need to know how to handle it in a different way instead of shooting a person numeric of times. I'm disappointing on how the cop handle the situation. It turns out not a good ending on how it made out. I give that cop a big thumbs down, for it's stupidest.
 
ButterflyGirl said:
How can you back up the police 100% if the naked man was unarmed when he was shot?

because first of all, the black boy was smoking dope and shooting a gun threatening people on 911 then when the police showed up he took off his clohtes to prevent identification running naked and try to make it home or something like that and even if he was unarmed, that does not always mean he is unarmed.

Pleasant said he retreated toward the back of his patrol car as Coates approached. Pleasant said he had both hands on his gun -- leaving him, he said, unable to use any nonlethal measure to subdue Coates.

"As the nude black male reached for my head and gun area, his hands were all in my face, I was in fear for my life and fired my service weapon," Pleasant said.

"Nothing changed," he said. "The nude black male didn't say oww, his expression didn't change."

Still fearing for his life, Pleasant said, he fired again, "at which time the nude black male dropped straight to the ground."
 
Heath, read this carefully....


The medical examiner found no powder burns on Coates's body and concluded in an autopsy report that "there was no evidence of close-range discharge of a firearm surrounding any of the gunshot wounds."


That proves to me that he wasn't even close enough to the police that made the police feel threaten by him....

The way I see it is that the police wanted to get the man, but he kept running away from the police and he could have shot the unarmed man many time until he was finally down on the ground...I don't believe a second that the police was fearing for his own life....I think it was more of an excuse to cover up his own action....


It could be one of your child, and are you going to sit here and nods by agreeing that the police did the right thing?....

Afterall, if anyone could lie, a police can lie too....
 
^Angel^ said:
Heath, read this carefully....





That proves to me that he wasn't even close enough to the police that made the police feel threaten by him....

The way I see it is that the police wanted to get the man, but he kept running away from the police and he could have shot the unarmed man many time until he was finally down on the ground...I don't believe a second that the police was fearing for his own life....I think it was more of an excuse to cover up his own action....


It could be one of your child, and are you going to sit here and nods by agreeing that the police did the right thing?....

Afterall, if anyone could lie, a police can lie too....

A police officer can be very close to the suspect and shoot then nothing turns up on the body powder burns etc. That is because the suspect was close enough at the edge of the boundary where the police officer fired his service weapon.

If my child was shot by the police, of course as a father I would be angry but I would try to find out what is happening first because police officers usually do not shoot without a very good reason as they have to file the paperwork and go through the investigation etc.

If the investigation shows that the police officer was wrong and I check myself in the police officer's boots to see what happened then if it does not make sense then something is up? then I would sue the police officer and have the courts pay for my son's funeral expenses and get millions of dollars but I would not try to get the police dept. to be broke and running in the red with their finanical budget either.
 
Yeah I can understand that but I don't expect a police officer to shot an unarmed man so many times.....I mean if a police did that to my own child when he not armed, then I'll be up the wall going after the police deparment....


I'm not sure if you saw the movie ' Cry for Help, the Tracy Trumple ( sp? ) Story? '....This case is about a wife who been abused by her husband, and she did all she could by calling the police about her husband being in the area when she had a court papers prove he wasn't allow near her, the police kept ignoring her calls, and making excuse by saying he's still her husband and he has every right to walk on her street or on her property....Until the day she got stabbed, jumped, etc by her abusive husband, the police were called in when it was happening, one police decide to go back to the police station because he has to go to the bathroom :jaw: .... the longer it took the longer Tracy was crying for help and laying there almost died when her husband kept stabbing and jumping on her so many times to the point where she was unable to move or protect herself...then later the police decide to show up, all the police did was try to grab the knife away from the husband instead of calling in for help for Tracy.....The polices who were involved in this case lied in court.....But the juries didn't buy the polices stories....So you're telling me that every police out there did the right thing, how they handle the situation in the way they thought it was best? I think not.... :-/
 
^Angel^ is correct, This story does not make no sense, I think the police is hiding something just to save her and his own ass. I don't buy this "I fear for my life". Once a cop shoot a person, put a handcuff on right away and it will end right there, But, shooting this guy many times it just wrong in my eyes.
 
^Angel^ said:
Yeah I can understand that but I don't expect a police officer to shot an unarmed man so many times.....I mean if a police did that to my own child when he not armed, then I'll be up the wall going after the police deparment....


I'm not sure if you saw the movie ' Cry for Help, the Tracy Trumple ( sp? ) Story? '....This case is about a wife who been abused by her husband, and she did all she could by calling the police about her husband being in the area when she had a court papers prove he wasn't allow near her, the police kept ignoring her calls, and making excuse by saying he's still her husband and he has every right to walk on her street or on her property....Until the day she got stabbed, jumped, etc by her abusive husband, the police were called in when it was happening, one police decide to go back to the police station because he has to go to the bathroom :jaw: .... the longer it took the longer Tracy was crying for help and laying there almost died when her husband kept stabbing and jumping on her so many times to the point where she was unable to move or protect herself...then later the police decide to show up, all the police did was try to grab the knife away from the husband instead of calling in for help for Tracy.....The polices who were involved in this case lied in court.....But the juries didn't buy the polices stories....So you're telling me that every police out there did the right thing, how they handle the situation in the way they thought it was best? I think not.... :-/
Oh yes I do remember this story about Tracy Thurman. I was so angry at the police for ignoring her pleas for help and to protect her from her abusive husband. These kind of police really sucks.
 
There are cases where there was serious police misconduct. I agree and police officers should answer the 911 calls everytime but please remember the police are not required to protect you. That is where you as a private citizen come in to buy a gun for self defense purposes and if you can't own a gun then have a weapon ready to defend yourself.
 
Heath said:
but please remember the police are not required to protect you.


Whoa, hold on a min here let me clean some waxes out of my ears, now can you please say that again....
 
Back
Top